• Reference: 2023/1259
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

The Transport for London (TfL) network is still regularly hosting advertising for both gambling and high-risk investments. Most of these adverts state lower down in their copy that the majority of people using these services lose money. Is it right for you to gain money from advertisers who are making money in this way, and when will you finally ban them?

• Reference: 2023/1258
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

What uses for paper ticketing have you removed from Transport for London (TfL) services since your election in 2016, and what funding have you put in place to retain paper ticketing? [References: (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Finance Committee, 08/03/2023 10:00 (tfl.gov.uk) (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Programmes and Investment Committee, 01/03/2023 10:00 (tfl.gov.uk)]

• Reference: 2023/1257
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2022/1876. Could you supply a table summary of all changes to Transport for London (TfL) bus services, including changes to routes, bus stop locations and frequencies, since January 2020, including details of: a) the route(s) affected, b) the borough(s) affected, c) the broad category of the change, d) whether each change was consulted upon, and e) the net change in bus kilometres that was expected?

• Reference: 2023/1256
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

The App Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU) has protested against the use of algorithmically determined fares and pay, and raised concerns about invasive personal profiling of drivers. What steps have you taken to address these concerns, and how are you regulating the Private Hire Vehicle (PHV) services that use these practices which are licensed by Transport for London (TfL)?

• Reference: 2023/1255
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

Thank you for your answer to question 2022/0507. For each year since the creation of the Young Londoners Fund (YLF), could you tell me: a) how much has been spent within each borough, and b) how many young people were helped in each borough?

• Reference: 2023/1254
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

Thank you for your answer to my question 2022/1007. Have you assessed the total impact of your policy for awarding exceptions for these demolitions in terms of embodied carbon?

• Reference: 2023/1253
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

Could you tell us the final outturn as of 31 March 2023 for the Affordable Homes Programme 2016-23, broken down by tenure, money allocated and total number of homes for each of: a) new build, b) demolition then rebuild, and c) acquisitions?

• Reference: 2023/1252
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

Brent Council’s planned infill housing development on the Kilburn Square estate has been allocated grant from the Affordable Homes Programme 2016-23, but on 7 March it informed residents that work will not start on site by 31 March 2023, and that it will now review all the options to provide a more viable and desirable scheme. Does this mean you will withdraw the grant funding, or will you be able to extend it or transfer the funding to the Affordable Homes Programme 2021-26?

• Reference: 2023/1251
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

In the February 2023 document, Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park Fixed Estate Charge Review, Submission to the Mayor, it is stated that the Fixed Estate Charge (FEC): “contributes towards the management of the parklands, footpaths, cycle ways, bridges, waterways and venues that make up Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park,” including the: “Provision of security and CCTV.” Residents in Chobham Manor pay the FEC because the area is within the Park, but have also raised concerns about community safety and lack of security staff on their estate. Could you clarify whether the services listed above, funded by the FEC, are meant to extend...

• Reference: 2023/1250
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 March 2023

Members of the Manor Gardening Society have contacted me about the delay in resetting the lease for Pudding Mill allotments back to its original 38 years once development is completed, to give back the time allotment holders have lost on the site due to disruption from both the negotiation of the Section 106 agreement and the proposed works on and off site. Could you update me on this process and what is holding up progress?