• Reference: 2021/4152
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

The recent review into the performance of the new 384 bus route recognises the difficulty of hailing the bus on Edgeworth Road, and proposed installing permanent bus stops. I understand that this was proposed to Barnet Council some time ago, but without response from the Council. Whom did TfL raise this request with?

• Reference: 2021/4151
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

The recent review into the performance of the new 384 bus route indicated there were alternative options for providing bus services around Station Road and Gloucester Road in New Barnet. These alternatives have not been accepted – what is the reason for this, and what was the outcome of the public consultation on returning bus services to this area?

• Reference: 2021/4150
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Residents of Salisbury Road in High Barnet continue to report objections to the 384 bus using their road, as this causes blockages, and in some cases altercations. What assessment did TfL make of re-routing the bus back towards its previous route, and how many objections did the previous route attract when it was changed?

• Reference: 2021/4149
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

The recent review into the performance of the new 384 bus route seems to indicate that it is feasible for alternative arrangements to be made to accommodate a bus route back around the Bevan Estate near Cockfosters. Will you press for one of these options to be taken up by TfL to ensure that the residents on that estate have access to bus services? Some parts of the estate are well above the minimum distances they should be from a bus service.

• Reference: 2021/4148
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Has an evidence-based view been undertaken on the feasibility of replacing concrete sleepers with wooden sleepers (reverting to what was in place prior to the installation of concrete sleepers) at hotspots on the network where the introduction of concrete sleepers has created excessive (over 40 decibels) residential noise disturbance?

• Reference: 2021/4147
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Is there a list of any locations on the Tube and Overground network where alternative (not PVs) rail noise and vibration dampening devices or measures have been installed - indicating the month and year of installation?

• Reference: 2021/4146
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Is there a list of all the locations on the Tube and Overground network where PVs have been installed, indicating the month and year of installation - and, in cases where those PVs have been removed, when that occurred and the reason (if known) for removal?

• Reference: 2021/4145
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Could you please provide an update on any tests or trials underway (anywhere on the Tube or Overground network) that apply dampening with wooden sleepers - in particular, what do the results show and when can any of these solutions be implemented at other locations on the network?

• Reference: 2021/4144
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Please provide an update on any tests or trials underway (anywhere on the Tube or Overground network) that use an alternative dampening method to Pandrol Vanguards (PVs) - in particular, what did the results (noise and vibration levels) show and when are any of these solutions due to be implemented at other locations on the network?

• Reference: 2021/4143
• Question by: Anne Clarke
• Meeting date: 14 October 2021

Did the Government consult you on their plans to change the voting system for the London Mayor to First Past The Post? If so, what was your response? If not, what would your response be?