• Reference: 2021/0439
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

Has TfL obtained any legal advice on whether under the 1999 GLA Act (as amended) there is the potential without primary legislation to introduce a greater London boundary charge for vehicles entering London. If legal advice exists that such a charge could legally be introduced without primary legislation, please set out the statutory requirements for consultation and other measures that would need to be taken before such a scheme could be introduced.

• Reference: 2021/0438
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

Do you consider it acceptable that MPs can claim back payments of the ULEZ charge through the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority scheme of expenses for MPs? Will you consider making representations to ensure that such payments are not an entitlement for MPs and that the imposition of the ULEZ charge applies equally to MPs as to all other drivers?

• Reference: 2021/0437
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

What would be the compensation payments that Crossrail would have to pay to the Canary Wharf for each month in 2022 that Canary Wharf Crossrail station is not connected to the Crossrail line?

• Reference: 2021/0436
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

What assurances can you provide local residents that the proposed planning application to the east of Montford Place, as set out in this planning application report by Lambeth Council https://moderngov.lambeth.gov.uk/documents/s123219/PAC%20REPORT%20MONTF… will fully observe all planning policies as set out in the London Plan and that due process will be fully upheld in every part of the planning process, considering the concern that some people might have that this application will be treated favourably due to the land being owned by Transport for London?

• Reference: 2021/0435
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

Further to question 2020/2555 when do you expect clarity of TfL’s finances will be reached to finally enable development on proposals for a Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf ferry?

• Reference: 2021/0434
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

What consideration is TfL giving to the proposal for a 530-metre multi-span, double-leaf bascule bridge immediately next to the Thames Barrier?

• Reference: 2021/0433
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

Please set out TfL’s planned response to each recommendation relating to Low Traffic Neighbourhoods made in the report Pave The Way produced by the organisation Transport for All?

• Reference: 2021/0432
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

What assurances can be given to local residents that bus services will be reviewed and set to match increased demand from the significant housing development on the Homebase site on Manor Road in Richmond?

• Reference: 2021/0431
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

What assessment has TfL undertaken of the recent reduction in frequency of the H37 bus service and the decision to stop using Manor Circus for the terminus for the H22 and 493. Will TfL consider restoring these services if evidence of demand exists?

• Reference: 2021/0430
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2021

What is the percentage cost of fare collection for TfL from payments by (a) Oyster, (b) contactless payment?