• Reference: 2021/2043
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Residents have raised significant access issues with this application following the Mayor’s call-in. The increase in units was revealed to local residents in late August for a digital consultation, thereby excluding a majority of residents for such a significant change to the plan. Those wishing to engage with planning documents on the GLA website are met with a large volume of over 150 untitled documents, arranged in no logical order, with no navigational aid or search capability provided to assist them. What the Mayor is doing to address this, and ensure that planning documents are accessible and easy to understand...

• Reference: 2021/2042
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Further to MQ 2020/4764, will you or your deputies commit to meeting with Mortlake Brewery Community Group and other residents to discuss the proposals in advance of the hearing for this application, and benefit from their substantial and deep knowledge of the local community?

• Reference: 2021/2041
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

In your consideration of the Mortlake Brewery planning application, which you called-in against the wishes of local residents and the local planning committee, how are you taking into account the significant transport and congestion problems that this development will cause, as well as the lack of provision of family-sized homes?

• Reference: 2021/2040
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

If you are unwilling to withdraw your call-in of this application, against the wishes of local residents and the local planning committee, will you take into account the significant local concerns and reject this scheme?

• Reference: 2021/2039
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

In view of your manifesto pledge to “not shy away from opposing tall buildings that do not enhance London’s skyline or provide little social or economic benefit”, will you take the opportunity to reconsider your decision to call-in this scheme, along with the subsequent increase in density and height, against the wishes of local residents and the local planning committee?

• Reference: 2021/2038
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Following your disappointing and regrettable decision to call-in and grant this application, against the wishes of significant numbers of local residents, could you please outline what progress is being made in drafting the Section 106 agreement and how you will mitigate the substantial local concerns regarding this scheme?

• Reference: 2021/2037
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

For years, Chiswick residents have campaigned for Piccadilly Line trains to stop at Turnham Green Station. This has been tied to the overall Piccadilly Line upgrade project, but trains could still stop at Turnham Green without the signalling being upgraded. Will the Mayor commit to a 6 month trial?

• Reference: 2021/2036
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

How will the Mayor ensure that this vital project – which will improve Piccadilly Line capacity by 60% - will be delivered during his current term of office?

• Reference: 2021/2035
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

If upgrading the Piccadilly Line signalling system is not the Mayor’s number one transport priority, what is?

• Reference: 2021/2034
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

In February 2020, then-commissioner Mike Brown described the Piccadilly Line signalling upgrade as the ‘number one priority’ for Transport for London. Does it remain the number one priority?