• Reference: 2021/2053
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

What specific actions has the MPS taken and what further actions will they take following the vile antisemitic scenes seen in London on Sunday 5th May? Following these vile scenes what is the MPS doing to support victims in the Jewish community?

• Reference: 2021/2052
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

What are you doing to prevent Antisemitism in London and what specific resources have you committed?

• Reference: 2021/2051
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

What is the Mayor doing, on behalf of residents on both sides of the River, to ask Hammersmith & Fulham Council to commit to making a reasonable financial contribution to fixing Hammersmith Bridge?

• Reference: 2021/2050
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

The ferry is not a long-term solution for the anticipated period until the bridge re-opens. What is the Mayor doing to progress a temporary crossing suitable for vehicles (including emergency vehicles), pedestrians and cyclists?

• Reference: 2021/2049
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Will the Mayor ensure ferry operating hours are integrated with local bus timetables and that the needs of the elderly and those with mobility issues are addressed in terms of lengths of walks to bus stops?

• Reference: 2021/2048
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

How can a 13% increase in affordable housing on the Stag Brewery scheme, to get to just 30% in total, be justified via a massive 40% increase in the number of residential units from 800 to 1,250? How does this conform to the Mayor’s viability policies and processes, and your objective to increase the percentage of affordable homes in developments rather than see a reduction?

• Reference: 2021/2047
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Despite the pressures of building new homes for London, can local residents depend on the Mayor to wholeheartedly enact policy and protect the community's open green space and existing recreation spaces, especially with the Covid experience of how precious these spaces are for people's wellbeing?

• Reference: 2021/2046
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Would you agree that continuing dialogue with local communities is very important for called-in applications, especially in cases such as this where schemes and designs significantly evolve following call-in? Will you commit to improving community engagement along these lines for called-in applications?

• Reference: 2021/2045
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Richmond Council’s local plan defines a tall building as six storeys or more, and its Supplementary Planning Guidance sets a maximum height of 7 storeys in this area. Meanwhile, policy D9 of your new London Plan, following direction by the Secretary of State, makes clear that tall buildings, as defined by the local authority, “should only be developed in locations that are identified as suitable in Development Plans”. Can you reassure local residents that you will respect these constraints, especially in view of your manifesto pledge to “not shy away from opposing tall buildings that do not enhance London’s skyline...

• Reference: 2021/2044
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 27 May 2021

Residents have expressed significant concerns about flaws with several supporting documents for this planning application. For example, the Stantec traffic report states that Thames Bank can support both through traffic and parking for 30+ vehicles - yet this road is subject to 28-ft tides 2x daily and is often flooded, rendering it dangerous to both through traffic and parked vehicles. In a second example, the Health Impact Assessment was updated in July 2020 but does not mention the Covid pandemic, despite the likely impact on future health and care needs. Is the Mayor satisfied with the quality of the underlying...