• Reference: 2021/3317
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

I understand that footpath / off-carriageway cycle track data are included in the Cycling Infrastructure Database, but which sections of track are fully accessible is not identified. What plans, if any, do you have to audit these cycle tracks to identify accessibility issues a) so cyclists know which tracks are not accessible and b) so TfL/Boroughs can seek to make them fully accessible at the earliest opportunity?

• Reference: 2021/3316
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

Can you confirm that all TfL branded cycle routes (cycleways, cycle superhighways and quietways) are fully accessible to all types of cycle, as per the London Cycling Design Standards concept of ‘the inclusive cycle’?

• Reference: 2021/3315
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

Local Transport Note 1/20’s ‘cycle design vehicle’ is similar to London Cycling Design Standards concept of ‘the inclusive cycle’. Can you update me on your review of the implications of the changes made in LTN 1/20 and whether the ‘inclusive cycle’ guidance needs to be updated?

• Reference: 2021/3314
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

The off-carriageway track on Camley Street shown on the TfL cycle map does not appear to be fully accessible. In July 2021 TfL contacted Camden Council to ask them to consider reviewing this access control layout. Can you update me on the response you have received from Camden and when the layout will be changed?

• Reference: 2021/3313
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

In June 2021, my office raised with TfL issues with the legibility of the TfL cycle map ( https://tfl.gov.uk/maps/cycle?intcmp=40402&intcmp=58492&intcmp=60683) and the lack of any legend explaining what the different coloured routes on the map refer to. Can you provide an update as to when the legibility issue will be resolved, and a legend added to the map?

• Reference: 2021/3312
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

Given the climate emergency are you concerned that a 4.8% fare rise in January 2022 will price people off public transport and into private motor vehicles?

• Reference: 2021/3311
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

What discussions, if any, have you had with the Government regarding their requirement that you raise fares by RPI+1% in January 2022? Is the Government minded to remove that condition for the TfL funding deal?

• Reference: 2021/3310
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

Atkins has been appointed by the Department for Transport (DfT) to carry out an accessibility audit of all UK rail stations over the next two years. What discussions, if any, has TfL had with Atkins regarding the audit of TfL stations?

• Reference: 2021/3309
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

Since restrictions have lifted we have seen an increase in people returning to work. The pandemic, adjusting to a return to work and to travelling to work will have all caused an increase in mental health issues, anxiety and stress for workers across London. If London is to have a healthy recovery out of the pandemic, employers will have to be more understanding about these sorts of issues. How are you ensuring TfL and the GLA family is setting that example for other employers across London and what work are you doing to spread best practice?

• Reference: 2021/3308
• Question by: Elly Baker
• Meeting date: 09 September 2021

What is TfL doing as an employer to recognise that the last 16 months has taken a toll on some TfL staff’s mental health and how are you supporting them?