• Reference: 2022/1877
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

What assessment has been made of the impact of the proposals in Transport for London’s Central London Bus Review on different age groups, such as young people who only get free travel on buses?

• Reference: 2022/1876
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Could you supply a table summary of all changes to Transport for London (TfL) bus services, including changes to routes, bus stop locations and frequencies, since January 2020, including details of: a) the route(s) affected, b) the broad category of the change, and c) whether each change was consulted upon.

• Reference: 2022/1875
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Could you supply a table summary of responses to each required consultation on changes to Transport for London (TfL) bus services since January 2020, including details of: a) the route(s) affected, b) the broad nature of the changes proposed, c) the dates of the consultation, d) the number of public responses, e) the number of stakeholder responses, f) a brief summary of the outcome, and g) a link to details of the outcome of the consultation?

• Reference: 2022/1874
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

How will you prioritise the allocation of funding for new secure cycle hangar provision in London, particularly so that it can reduce car ownership and use?

• Reference: 2022/1873
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

How many residential cycle hangars are currently installed in each borough in London, and how many new bike hangars pending installation have been funded by you and relevant councils?

• Reference: 2022/1872
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Given the Equalities Impact Assessment (EQIA) for your proposed bus cuts appears to acknowledge that Londoners who will have to change buses several times to complete their current journeys may not be covered by the one-hour Hopper fare time limit, will you consider modelling the costs and potential benefits of: a) extending the Hopper fare time limit, and b) making bus journeys free if they link with tube journeys within this time limit?

• Reference: 2022/1871
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Thank you for your answer to my question 2021/4456. Anyone purchasing the cryptocurrency whose adverts sparked my concern most recently would have lost rather than gained from that purchase. Are you really going to wait until thousands of Londoners have lost money to unregulated and suspect ‘investments’ before you stop accepting applications for advertisements for cryptocurrency and related trading platforms on Transport for London (TfL) services?

• Reference: 2022/1870
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Thank you for your answer to my question 2022/1007. Could I ask for a further detailed breakdown of the home demolitions (and replacements) that were given grant based on the existing homes being ‘obsolete’, including a breakdown showing the housing provider, estates concerned, and the reasons given for defining homes as ‘obsolete’ for the following three council areas: a) Camden, b) Kensington and Chelsea, and c) Lambeth?

• Reference: 2022/1869
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Thank you for your answer to my question 2022/1007. Could you provide further information about the different criteria submitted by councils and social landlords to determine why these homes are classified by them as ‘obsolete’ and incapable of letting for long-term tenancies? If different criteria were used by different councils could you provide a table showing which criteria were used by each council and social landlord?

• Reference: 2022/1868
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 23 June 2022

Thank you for your answer to my question 2022/1007, in which you wrote that an obsolete home is defined as one: “where an affordable home is no longer considered by the landlord to be capable for letting for long term tenancies.” Could you provide further clarification about what you mean by ‘long term tenancies’ in this context? For example, could a home that was previously used for secure tenancies but has been used for several years as temporary accommodation be classified as ‘obsolete?’