• Reference: 2023/2113
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

In your response to question 2022/2980, you stated: “Stagecoach was asked to consider the content and frequency of its driver training relating to the ferry lift switch. Additional guidance was incorporated into its training for all applicable vehicles based on the Wrightbus Technical Bulletin. Meeting minutes confirm Transport for London shared this information with the other London Bus operators around May 2016. However, due to system and personnel changes during the time that has elapsed, it has not been possible to retrieve a copy of what was shared.” How can we be assured that TfL is indeed monitoring the implementation...

• Reference: 2023/2112
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

After 9 months, you have not provided the basic safety information I requested in questions 2022/2978 and 2022/2979. This suggests to me, that TfL does not consider that ‘Prevention of Future Deaths Reports’, issued to TfL by coroners’ courts, are relevant to the safe operation of its transport network. How do reconcile this with your Vision Zero programme?

• Reference: 2023/2111
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

As a GMB Union Member, you will know that this union’s national congress recently approved a motion that states: “We call on congress to support a campaign for dignity in the toilet for all workplaces and public places to provide facilities fit for the 21st Century.” Do you support this motion? If so, how do you reconcile that with TfL’s long-standing policy – agreed with bus operators and Unite the Union – which has resulted in bus drivers not having access to toilets on at least 1 in 4 London bus routes?

• Reference: 2023/2110
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

In response to question 2023/1326, you admitted: (a) that TfL has no legal opinion which states that the 'priority classification’ for bus driver toilets fully satisfies the legal requirements of several laws which oblige the provision of toilet facilities for workers; and (b) that TfL has never conducted an HSE ‘Human Factors’ assessment of this 'priority classification’ which clearly states that ‘a maximum duration’ for a bus driver to be ‘without access to a toilet for 150 minutes’ is safe for bus drivers, passengers and road users? Do you agree that TfL’s, in my view, failure to resolve this matter...

• Reference: 2023/2109
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

In your response to question 2022/2993 you failed to explain the issues I raised, namely: (a) the reason for the persistence of bus drivers’ evidenced complaints about the lack of working air conditioning on London buses; and (b) your lack of acknowledgement there appears to be a systemic problem that requires your urgent intervention and regular monitoring. We are now in the eighth year of your Mayoralty and your term as TfL Chair. Instead of in my view, continually downplaying this longstanding Safety-Critical Failure that you have the powers to mitigate – but have in my view failed to do...

• Reference: 2023/2108
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

Broken down by year, how much has the ULEZ cost a) the Metropolitan Police Service b) the London Fire Brigade and c) - if you hold the data - the London Ambulance Service?

• Reference: 2023/2107
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

How much money has TfL raised as their share of revenue from Taxi Dedicated Charge Points?

• Reference: 2023/2106
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

Will you update the Assembly on your answer to question 2022/5231?

• Reference: 2023/2105
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

Why has the W12 bus been cut from three buses an hour to two?

• Reference: 2023/2104
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 22 June 2023

Having been offered vouchers for completing a TfL survey my constituents found that they had to sign up to Love2Shop’s website, despite having no interest in doing so. They then found that there was no money on the vouchers and that it was impossible to reach Kantar on the phone. Do you recognise that this will damage TfL’s reputation and defeats the object of the survey, and will you ensure that TfL investigates this ridiculous situation and fixes it?