• Reference: 2023/3119
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

Transport for London (TfL) has published an updated Cycling Action Plan in line with your current Transport Strategy, which has targets set to 2041. However, you have also set a target for London to be net zero by 2030. Will you need to update your Transport Strategy to bring targets in line with 2030, and will this mean bringing targets forward from 2041 or a wider update?

• Reference: 2023/3118
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

Transport for London (TfL) has published an updated Cycling Action Plan in line with your current Transport Strategy, which has targets set to 2041. However, you have also set a target for London to be net zero by 2030. What mode share and journey numbers will be needed by 2030 for walking, cycling and public transport separately?

• Reference: 2023/3117
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

The first Cycling Action Plan you published in 2019 had an appendix with a cycling delivery plan for 2019-2024. For each of the schemes in each of the tables of this appendix, could you provide an updated table with: a) current status, b) expected date for construction to start, and c) expected date for scheme to open?

• Reference: 2023/3116
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

Could you provide a table giving the current status of each Transport for London (TfL) Liveable Neighbourhood project that has ever been awarded funding including: a) scheme name, b) borough, c) funds awarded for each year from 2016-17 to 2022-23, d) committed spend to date, e) remaining funds, f) project status, g) project construction start date, and h) project construction completion date.

• Reference: 2023/3115
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

The Transport for London (TfL) scheme to upgrade the A316 London Road roundabout includes a plan to provide pedestrian crossings on each arm of the junction. What other similar schemes have you completed since May 2016 that provide pedestrian crossings on each arm of a junction where previously there was at least one arm without such a crossing?

• Reference: 2023/3114
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

Transport for London (TfL) has just published the latest data on collisions on London streets. Is it possible for TfL to incorporate within this data which collisions are at junctions where a person is hit by a motor vehicle when crossing a junction that has signals for motor vehicles but not for pedestrians?

• Reference: 2023/3113
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

In its evidence submitted to the Housing Committee investigation into the Affordable Homes Programme 2016-23 (AHP 2016-23) on 27 June 2023, the National Audit Office (NAO) stated: “The Department [for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities] (DLUHC) had inadequate oversight of the GLA. The Department does not provide political oversight, as the GLA is democratically held to account by the London Assembly.” However, the NAO also stated that DLUHC: “did not receive all the information that would be expected in good programme performance reporting,” although “in January 2022, a ‘deep dive’ report provided more detail on the AHP 2016-21.” As the...

• Reference: 2023/3112
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

Thank you for your answers to my questions 2023/0312 and 2023/0313. As the GLA is not currently monitoring the precise nature of back-to-back staircasing and resale transactions and, given the very high number of unmortgageable flats in London due to the ongoing building safety crisis, have you asked Registered Providers how many shared owners have had to sell their flat to cash buyers in a distressed sale transaction over the last three years?

• Reference: 2023/3111
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

Since the introduction of London Plan policy G5, how many developments that have achieved the Urban Greening Factor target score of 0.4 have also resulted in the destruction of mature trees, and how many mature trees in total have been lost through these developments?

• Reference: 2023/3110
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 20 July 2023

In your answer to question 2023/2570, you said: “On average, Fast Track Route schemes provide higher levels of affordable housing and progress through the planning system quicker than viability tested schemes.” Could you give me a breakdown detailing in total the percentage of affordable housing that Fast Track Route schemes provided compared with affordable housing provided by viability tested schemes, for each year between from April 2018 to March 2023? Could you also provide a breakdown of tenure within the affordable housing numbers?