• Reference: 2023/3365
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Following (a) your response to question 2023/2132 which did not answer my query and (b) the substance of Justice Fraser’s sentencing remarks and TfL being subjected to the largest health and safety fine in UK history, what do you feel are the weakest links on safety across TfL’s management of the ‘Public Surface Transport Network’ and what documentary evidence can you provide that you are fixing them?

• Reference: 2023/3364
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Justice Fraser’s itemisation of TfL’s and Tram Operations Limited’s Croydon Tram safety failings in his sentencing remarks echo the same safety and incident reporting complaints that have been raised for over a decade over TfL’s contracted bus operation. What assurances can you provide to the public that lessons have indeed been learned from Sandilands that will result in major reform of the safety culture across TfL Surface Transport?

• Reference: 2023/3363
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Why was the 2008 operating agreement for London Trams between Transport for London and Tram Operations Ltd never executed? Is it customary for TfL to allow major transport services to be operated by third parties without an executed agreement in place?

• Reference: 2023/3362
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Given the substance of Justice Fraser’s damning sentencing remarks and the fact that both TfL and First Group were penalised with the largest UK health and safety fine ever, do you agree with me that the current operating agreement for London Trams between Transport for London and Tram Operations Ltd should be scrapped in favour of an entirely new operating agreement which incorporates all the ‘learnings’ of the 9 November 2016 Sandilands disaster and subsequent investigations?

• Reference: 2023/3361
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

What is your understanding of the potential financial liabilities TfL faces in data breach fines if TfL has failed in its statutory duty to protect the personal data that has been captured from the general public via ULEZ cameras?

• Reference: 2023/3360
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Does TfL, acting as both the Data Controller & Data Processor, have a statutory duty to protect the personal data that has been captured from the general public via ULEZ cameras?

• Reference: 2023/3359
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Has TfL been reporting ULEZ camera thefts as data breaches?

• Reference: 2023/3358
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Would the theft of a ULEZ camera potentially constitute a data breach?

• Reference: 2023/3357
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Could that personal data be accessed if the ULEZ camera is stolen?

• Reference: 2023/3356
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Is personal data, such as images, number plates, and timestamps stored on ULEZ cameras?