• Reference: 2023/3469
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

When do you expect the UK Government to come to an agreement to allocate funding for the replacement of the Bakerloo line trains?

• Reference: 2023/3468
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

When did you last discuss with the UK Government funding for replacing Bakerloo line trains?

• Reference: 2023/3467
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

What discussions have you had with the UK Government on the funding for replacing Bakerloo line trains?

• Reference: 2023/3466
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

A new report from the Railway Industry Association (RIA) has shown that unless action is taken now on rolling stock orders for the upgrade or replacement of the oldest trains on the railway, thousands of jobs and decades of experience will be at risk of being lost. With train orders often taking years to complete, placing orders now, or at the very least, making the commitment to place orders soon will ensure the factories aren’t closed down. Have you asked the UK Government to commit to replacing the Bakerloo line trains, even if the small print about the funding is...

• Reference: 2023/3465
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

How many GLA group vehicles are not ULEZ compliant? (broken down by percentage and raw number)

• Reference: 2023/3464
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Will people who previously bought a new vehicle but at the time were not eligible to apply to the ULEZ Scrappage scheme be able to make a retrospective application?

• Reference: 2023/3463
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

What is the precise funding source for the extra £50million announced on 4 August 2023 for the Ultra Low Emission Zone scrappage scheme?

• Reference: 2023/3462
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

The “Assessment of Vessel Traffic Capacity on the River Thames in Central London,” commissioned in 2016 by the Port of London Authority and Transport for London, stated that the mooring of cruise ships at HMS Belfast increased the risk of a collision adjacent to Tower Pier by 15% - 30%, and that the greatest risk of major incidents arose near Tower Pier and HMS Belfast where vessels berthing at Tower Pier encounter through traffic. Has Transport for London considered these findings in relation to Oceandiva, and in particular in relation to its potential turning manoeuvres in this area?

• Reference: 2023/3461
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

How does Transport for London assess the impact of micro-mobility providers, such as Tier, Dott, Lime or HumanForest, as part of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy and targets towards more sustainable modes of travel across London?

• Reference: 2023/3460
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 14 September 2023

Residents in North Barnes have expressed concerns around fit-for-purpose usage of small neighbourhood roads, such as Lonsdale Road, Kilmington Road, Howsman Road and Verdun Road, by TfL for the 33, 209 and 485 service routes. Before the closure of Hammersmith Bridge, these roads only accommodated the 419 bus. Given the prolonged closure of Hammersmith Bridge, what assessments have been carried out on the potential re-routing of those buses to ensure they reflect the needs of the residents of Barnes?