• Reference: 2023/3635
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

In your response to question 2022/2175, you mention a bi-monthly Bus Fatigue Working Group with London’s bus operators. Can you provide me with minutes and agendas of these meetings?

• Reference: 2023/3634
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

Has the Audit and Assurance Committee changed its policy so that future Audits won’t “disappear”, like IA 16767, from the Public Record?

• Reference: 2023/3633
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

Was anyone disciplined at TfL for failing to provide information to the RAIB Investigation? What evidence can you provide that this behaviour will not be repeated in the future?

• Reference: 2023/3632
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

Since (a) TfL and First Group have already received the largest Health and Safety fine in history and (b) the Sandilands families may seek to overturn the Inquest Verdict of “Accidental Death”, will you instruct TfL to a) publish the redacted letter dated 24 January 2017 in response to a request from the RAIB for IA 16767 that TfL released in its response to question 2019/17340; and b) publish a link to the evidence TfL made available, in its response to 2019/17340 on the GLA’s Mayor’s Question Time website? Given this evidence has been published by a concerned member of...

• Reference: 2023/3631
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

On 7 September, TfL announced a ‘bold new strategy for making buses safer’ which seems to me to essentially be a rebranding of the ‘world leading’ Bus Safety programme TfL announced in February 2016, the Vision Zero programme announced in July 2018 and the ‘world leading’ Bus Safety Standard announced in October 2018. What stood out most about this ‘new’ strategy is a chart on Page 19 which clearly evidences that the number of people killed or seriously injured from a bus safety incident has increased over your time as Mayor and we’re now back to where we were in...

• Reference: 2023/3630
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

In your response to question 2023/3333, you stated, “As TfL explained when it wrote to you, due to the sensitivities with regard to the circumstances and families involved, it did not feel it was appropriate to publish these reports on its website. This continues to be TfL’s view.” Since, as you know from my questions 2020/3655 and 2020/4103, for years TfL regularly published statements about bus-related fatal incidents on its bus safety data releases before any Inquest was held, am I to assume that the sensitivities you’re concerned about are because, as you indicated in your response to question 2022/2981...

• Reference: 2023/3629
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

How much is the contract cost for the security staff TfL has deployed to guard the mobile ULEZ camera vans?

• Reference: 2023/3628
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

Can you give Londoners an indication of how much the tolling for the Silvertown Tunnel will be?

• Reference: 2023/3627
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

Given there are scheduled flights from Heathrow from 6am will you commit to introducing half hourly Elizabeth Line trains which arrive at Heathrow from 3:30?

• Reference: 2023/3626
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 12 October 2023

Redbridge Council has indicated that they are waiting for further GLA guidance and data before undertaking a review of their Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs), which have not been reviewed since 1997. Can you please confirm whether this in fact the case, and whether there are any barriers from the GLA to starting this process immediately?