• Reference: 2012/2165
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

The Community Infrastructure Levy has to ensure it does not impact on the viability of development. Since the Mayoral CIL was published, the government has changed the definition of viability. This means that the boroughs, who are now publishing their own CILs, will be developing them to a different definition of 'viability' to what the GLA did. What impact, if any, do you anticipate this change in definition having?

• Reference: 2012/2164
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

With the uncertainty surrounding the effects of the Community Infrastructure Levy, what efforts have you taken to ensure the mayoral CIL will not have an adverse impact on the viability of development given that most boroughs are still to release their schedules?

• Reference: 2012/2163
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

When will the Revised London Housing Strategy be published?

• Reference: 2012/2162
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

What takes precedence, a presumption against development on back gardens that is supported by the London Plan or the National Planning Policy Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development when a planning proposal presents a conflict between the two?

• Reference: 2012/2161
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

Your revised London Plan states that it 'supports development plan-led presumptions against development on backgardens where locally justified by a sound local evidence base'. What types of evidence do you envisage providing a sound justification for such a presumption?

• Reference: 2012/2160
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

Your 2008 manifesto pledged to 'protect private tenants from unscrupulous landlords by publishing an online 'Fair Rents Guide''. How has the online rents guide (now called the London Rents Map) protected tenants from 'unscrupulous' landlords?

• Reference: 2012/2159
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

Your 2008 manifesto pledged to 'explore the possibility of a tenant deposit scheme with a guaranteed arbitration period of one month'. What progress has been made?

• Reference: 2012/2158
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

Will you allow public attendance at meetings of the Homes for London board for sections of those meetings where the agenda reports have already been made publicly available on the internet?

• Reference: 2012/2157
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

Will the London Rental Standard be a voluntary scheme?

• Reference: 2012/2156
• Question by: Nicky Gavron
• Meeting date: 04 July 2012

What are the time frames for delivering the London Rental Standard?