• Reference: 2020/2575
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

Point 3.33 of the minutes of the 10 September Safety Sustainability and Human Resources Panel Meeting states "We will undoubtedly have less capital budget in the future. This means that achieving our ambitious targets for safety improvement, particularly around Vision Zero, will be inevitably more challenging." If safety is, as you claim, top priority, are you now preparing the ground to abandon your Vision Zero targets?

• Reference: 2020/2574
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

Further to my Question 2020/2122 will you consider instructing an independent body to benchmark London against its peer world cities for deaths and hospitalisations of transport workers from Covid-19?

• Reference: 2020/2573
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

Point 3.29 of the minutes of the 10 September 2020 Safety, Sustainability and HR Panel Meeting states “We are considering whether we could have anticipated changes to that advice and implemented some of our actions earlier.” Why is this activity (a) being conducted internally and (b) was not included in Phase 1 of UCL IHE’s "Review into coronavirus infections and deaths among bus workers"?

• Reference: 2020/2572
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

What level of services will operate on the London Overground on the 26 December 2020?

• Reference: 2020/2571
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

What assurances can you give local residents that in considering the revised planning application for this development that full consideration is being given to the traffic implications of the long-term closure of Hammersmith Bridge?

• Reference: 2020/2570
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

The leader of Camden Council recently responded to residents of Oakley Square North who had contracted her relating to concerns about the impact of the cycle lane on the A400 stating: “We also note your concerns about the impact of this scheme on Oakley Square North. We wrote to TfL as they were preparing the scheme on the south side of the Square, which is on their network, and asked to ensure Oakley Square North was carefully monitored during the scheme to ensure any impacts on the north side (Camden’s road network) were assessed. We would therefore also be keen...

• Reference: 2020/2900
• Question by: Tony Devenish
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

Have you acted swiftly and sufficiently enough to prepare Londoners and businesses for the lifestyle changes of a post-pandemic London?

• Reference: 2020/3050
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

Please provide an update on the design and implementation of LFB’s PN633.

• Reference: 2020/2913
• Question by: David Kurten
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

How will you ensure that your Streetspace and Healthy Streets programmes do not cause congestion on London’s roads?

• Reference: 2020/3146
• Question by: Alison Moore
• Meeting date: 17 September 2020

Are you satisfied with the arrangements and amounts available for meeting the cost of the remediation of private sector and housing association owned tall buildings with dangerous cladding; and the progress with such remediation work; and are you concerned about the demands on the LFB to inspect such buildings until remediated?