• Reference: 2020/4290
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Will you commit to reporting in detail on tenures, rent costs, and developers of all sites sold or leased, (or due to be), through London Development Panel 2 at the earliest opportunity?

• Reference: 2020/4289
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Will you make detailed, separate regional reporting a grant condition of receiving Approved Provider and Strategic Partner status for the 2021-26 Affordable Housing Programme?

• Reference: 2020/4288
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

What consideration have you given to requiring separate regional reporting for London and the rest of England? For all multi-region providers, will the GLA report in detail on all sources of revenue (by tenure, for existing stock and new build; capital receipts from social rent void sales/disposals etc); all costs (land/construction etc); and the tenures of new housing supply, for the current and future affordable Housing Programmes, including the available figures for the 2021-26 programme?

• Reference: 2020/4287
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Will you consider making it a grant condition of receiving Approved Provider and Strategic Partner status during the 2021-26 Affordable Housing Programme that associations should follow the National Housing Federation’s recommendation of only selling social rent voids at Existing Use Value Social Housing to councils or other providers, to retain social rent stock; reduce homelessness, and boroughs’ cost for temporary accommodation?

• Reference: 2020/4286
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Some housing associations are allowing flexibility so that shared owners can let out their property while the building is awaiting an EWS1 assessment as owners are currently unable to sell them without such an assessment. What is your position on this, and if you support this will you be encouraging all housing associations to offer the same degree of flexibility to shared owners in such situations?

• Reference: 2020/4285
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

According to a recent MHCLG report, there are 251 high-rise residential and publicly owned buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations in London, 72 in Greater Manchester and 137 in the Rest of England. Remediation is complete for 78 buildings in London (31% of all buildings identified in the capital), 38 buildings in Greater Manchester (53%), and 86 buildings in the Rest of England (63%). Do you share my serious concerns that London is significantly behind the rest of the country in terms of the remediation of Grenfell-style ACM cladding remediation works, and how are you...

• Reference: 2020/4284
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

I understand the LFB recently undertook fire safety reviews of London care homes. Can you please provide the details of what practical actions came from this review as well as timescales and progress on the actions that were identified? https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/feb/03/care-homes-fail-fire-sa…

• Reference: 2020/4283
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Would you support the establishment of a public register of fire risk assessors so homeowners can verify that fire assessors are qualified to conduct compulsory checks, and enable government and industry to assess the numbers required to be trained?

• Reference: 2020/4282
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Do you support the proposal for a public register of fire risk assessments, so would-be renters and owners can check the fire safety status of their potential new home, such as the one used to register domestic Energy Performance Certificates (EPC)?

• Reference: 2020/4281
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 17 December 2020

Do you agree with me that it is wrong that under current legislation leaseholders have no legal right to see the fire risk assessment for the building in which they live?