• Reference: 2025/1791
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

What proportion of the cycle network in London you claim to have delivered meets the Department for Transport (DfT) Cycle Infrastructure Design (LTN 1/20) standards in full, and do you have any map showing which sections do and do not?

• Reference: 2025/1790
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

What proportion of the cycle network in London that you claim to have quadrupled since 2016 was in fact on paths or roads that already had a signed or designated cycle route then?

• Reference: 2025/1789
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Is Transport for London (TfL) planning to fund Southwark Council’s scheme for Peckham Rye that proposes cycle lane widths which are half the minimum requirement for current cycling flows, despite being in an area that TfL has identified as having the highest potential for growth?

• Reference: 2025/1788
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

How have you ensured that borough Healthy Streets delivery plans and proposals are aligned to deliver the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS) target for a 27 per cent reduction in car use (and associated increases in sustainable modes) by 2030?

• Reference: 2025/1787
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

In light of reports in the press about increased pedestrian road deaths in London in 2024, how confident are you that the borough Healthy Streets delivery plans that Transport for London (TfL) has approved, will not only reverse this, but also put London on track to meet your Vision Zero targets?

• Reference: 2025/1786
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Your March 2025 note on the legal context of Local Implementation Plan (LIP) funding says that you can only approve ‘a LIP (including initial delivery plans) if adequate to implement the MTS [Mayor’s Transport Strategy]’. In this legal context how did you ensure you only approved borough follow-up delivery plans that were adequate to meet MTS targets?

• Reference: 2025/1785
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

A constituent has queried the following: a) why was there no consultation on the TfL Have Your Say website regarding the withdrawal of the paper One Day Bus and Tram Pass, b) why was the Equality Impact Assessment (EqIA) not revised to consider the needs of victims of crime, particularly those who have had their wallets, purses, or smartphones stolen and are temporarily unable to access transport while waiting for replacement cards (including Oyster and concession passes) to arrive in the post, and c) with the withdrawal of the paper One Day Bus and Tram Pass and the high cost...

• Reference: 2025/1784
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

A constituent has contacted me to find out how many hail-and-ride bus routes, such as the R5 and R10, are running in London and whether they are all fully accessible for disabled people?

• Reference: 2025/1783
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Could you tell me, broken down by borough: a) the total Local Implementation Plan (LIP) budget allocated for new micromobility parking bays, b) how many new bays will be created, and c) how the location, implementation and use of these bays will be tracked?

• Reference: 2025/1782
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 22 May 2025

Could you tell me what assessments have been made of the energy demands from the proposed wraparound advertising screens at Elizabeth line stations, plus the 1,000 digital screens being installed across the Underground network, as well as the energy used in the production of these screens?