• Reference: 2021/4761
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

You have committed to a review of the policy and process around major estate regeneration ballots. What discussions are you having with residents on estates where ballots have taken place, especially estates like Love Lane in Tottenham, where worrying complaints have been made about the process and approach that has been taken?

• Reference: 2021/4760
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

The GLA website at present appears to show an inconsistency in the updates of gifts and hospitality and the register of interests for Deputy Mayors, with some records not having been publicly updated since 2018/19. Will you ensure that publication of this information is consistent and kept up to update?

• Reference: 2021/4759
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Given your ambition to reach net zero by 2030 are you satisfied to see use of gas boilers in this GLA funded project, which is unlikely to be opened before late 2022?

• Reference: 2021/4758
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Are you aware that the City of London Corporation planners of the Sydenham Hill development claimed that a smaller less harmful development would not be viable, but have never presented any viability evidence, despite the fact that your Good Practice Guide For Estate Regeneration states that "all estate regeneration schemes are required under the Mayor’s draft London Plan (2017) to follow a ‘Viability Tested Route’ to planning permission.”?

• Reference: 2021/4757
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Are you satisfied that the applicant has demonstrated that the development does not impact on the neighbouring listed estate and adjacent conservation area and will not cause harm to their setting and character, further to the professional advice received by the GLA as set out in the heritage documentation revealed in the Freedom of Information request MGLA240820-1964?

• Reference: 2021/4756
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Are you satisfied that the proposed redevelopment of Mais House is compatible with the assumptions made in the GLA’s recommendations set out in correspondence from the Freedom of Information request MGLA240820-1964?

• Reference: 2021/4755
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Are you comfortable with GLA functional bodies accepting large donations from the Freemasons?

• Reference: 2021/4754
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

In answer to MQ2021/3996 you stated - “There is an intention to explore the use of the iREPORTit app in wider policing.” Can you update me on how you are working with the Met and others to deliver this?

• Reference: 2021/4753
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Can you provide a list of mobile app delivery companies you have written to on the need to ensure their delivery staff are not using private e-scooters, which are illegal for use on public highways and pavements? Please also provide a copy of the standard letter you have sent.

• Reference: 2021/4752
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 16 December 2021

Can you provide a list of retailers you have written to regarding the need for responsible and clear labelling around the illegality of e-scooters for use on public highways and pavements? Please also provide a copy of the standard letter you have sent.