• Reference: 2023/0156
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

The reason why it is not currently possible to pay for multiple family members with a single credit or debit card is the daily cap. Would it be technologically feasible to adapt the system so that if the same card were used multiple times within 5 minutes on the same bus the daily cap were automatically disabled for that card for the remainder of the day? If so, would TfL consider this approach?

• Reference: 2023/0155
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

When foreign visitors come to London they may be unaware that they are unable to use a single credit or debit card to pay for public transport for all their family members. What more can be done to make non-Londoners aware of this rule and encourage them to purchase an Oyster Card for each family member?

• Reference: 2023/0154
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Just before Christmas a constituent wrote to me after his daughter witnessed a tourist try to pay for his wife and himself on a bus at Heathrow Airport using a single credit card. The driver refused to allow them to travel and my constituent’s daughter, who had a spare card, paid the lady's fare. My constituent notes that “despite this, the couple and their two young children were ordered off the bus by the driver at a subsequent stop, as he judged them to be rude. In fact, they had limited English, couldn't understand the system and were astonished by...

• Reference: 2023/0153
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Given that delivering 3.7% of bus cuts across the whole of London would have saved £35 million per annum, please can you give a detailed explanation of how reversing 78% of the 1.6% cuts constituted by the Central London Bus Review would cost £25 million a year?

• Reference: 2023/0152
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

The cuts outlined in the Central London Bus Review would have cut bus mileage across London by 1.6%. On a pro rata basis, this would suggest those cuts would have saved around £15 million per annum. What is the actual figure?

• Reference: 2023/0151
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Can you confirm that TfL’s initial plans to cut bus mileage across London by 3.7% were expected to deliver a potential £35 million annual saving?

• Reference: 2023/0150
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Do you recognise that if ULEZ non-compliant cars tend to drive fewer miles than compliant cars ANPR-derived data would underestimate the number of non-compliant vehicles in outer London?

• Reference: 2023/0149
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Can you confirm that TfL’s estimate of the percentage of cars in outer London that are not ULEZ compliant is derived from ANPR camera data?

• Reference: 2023/0148
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

Before the publishing of the recent Cambridge study, was TfL previously aware of the abundance of tiny Iron Oxide particles on the London Underground?

• Reference: 2023/0147
• Question by: Nick Rogers
• Meeting date: 19 January 2023

If TfL is investigating the possible health implications of an abundance of tiny Iron Oxide particles on the London Underground, how soon does it expect to reach a conclusion on whether it should be taking action to reduce the incidence of these particles?