• Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

My question says, `Will TfL be reviewing whether it is getting value for money or not?' From your answer, you would say that he is giving excellent value for money, despite the enormous sums that he is being paid. I need not rattle them off because they are in the annual report.

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

That is all right. Is it more than ten, less than ten?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

How much have you spent advising Mr Kiley on his tax position?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

Do not count on it. How much time has he spent in this country and how much in New York, since his contract started?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

We will try something else and leave the High Court aside for the moment. What has he actually achieved for you since his contract started? What can you point to as a concrete achievement?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

Since his contract started, how many times have you met him?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

With respect, we paid him for that before the consultancy, and we are paying Peter Hendy for that now. Surely you are not paying twice for these improvements.

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

So you cannot point to any concrete achievement?

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

But why are we paying him so much? It is because you bought him out, is it not?

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 18 November 2006

I think your present Commissioner is doing a much better job than your last Commissioner, and I think you have made a very good choice there, but I still want to know, if you think so much about Bob Kiley, why did you let him go? Tell us about the strife there was within TfL.