• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

Right. But is there a risk then that if we are really going to get the things that local communities aspire to have, we are going to have to look for additional funding from additional places to fund those things? So, if we want the Olympic Boulevard to happen, so that it is a major thoroughfare of London connecting a new business district at Stratford with the City of London , that will have to be funded from elsewhere; TfL or someone else?

• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

OK. We talked briefly about bridges earlier on. On the one hand there is a very real security concern which means the Olympic Park will be sealed off from the rest of the planet, more or less, during the Olympic Games. On the other hand, an aspiration that after the Games its benefit will flow massively over that boundary and into the adjoining communities. To what extent do your investments in the Olympics ensure that that happens, or is it not your problem?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

OK, thanks. If I can briefly move on now to sustainability standards? Last month the Mayor told us that now the budget had been agreed, we can expect improvements in the environmental standards for the Olympics. What changes will be made now that you have the money in the budget?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

Thank you. David [Higgins] mentioned the size of the Park earlier, but the new planning application does reduce the amount of open space in the Park by the equivalent of 34 football pitches, from 127 hectares to 109 hectares. The application is smaller than the previous one. We are getting a smaller park are we not?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

In your initial response to Darren's [Johnson] question you gave quite an impressive list of facilities which will be available on the site after the Games are after. A while ago there was talk about some of those facilities being dismantled to take them elsewhere, to share the legacy around. Is that still the case?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

Inside London or outside London?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

So is this just things like seating and bits and pieces, or is it actual venues and facilities?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

OK. Where are they going?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

Which facilities will be moved?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 25 April 2007

So the other pieces of public open space which are not contained in this application will be in other applications or have been agreed already?