• Reference: 2014/3185
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Given your public health responsibilities, will ask all London schools to stock emergency inhalers for children, as the law has now changed to allow this to happen?

• Reference: 2014/3184
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Thank you for your positive answer to question 2014/2737. When do you expect to complete this review? If you have already done so, can you tell me your conclusions?

• Reference: 2014/3183
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Who did your economics advisor Dr Gerard Lyons speak to in drawing up his report on Europe? Please list individual names and the organisations they represent.

• Reference: 2014/3182
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

The Government are proposing to introduce a new permitted development right to convert light industrial buildings and storage and distribution buildings to residential use. Do you agree that this could threaten strategic and locally important industrial locations in London, and if so will you seek their protection in your response to the technical consultation on planning?

• Reference: 2014/3181
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

With reference to question 2013/1680 you stated that you intend to monitor the effects of the changes to permitted development rights brought in last May. What did you find?

• Reference: 2014/3180
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Last year the Government increased the size limits allowed for rear garden extensions and conservatories within permitted development rights. Originally these changes were introduced for a period of three years, however, only a year in, the Government now intends to make these changes permanent. Given your earlier concerns about the potential impact on local amenity, including the loss of garden land and on neighbours, will you condemn this proposal?

• Reference: 2014/3179
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

In the light of the comments made by the judge in the case involving claims made by women deceived into relationships with undercover officers (Mr Justice Bean in Dil and others v CPM), that there was a "clear prima facie case" that Mark Cassidy was Mark Jenner and John Barker was John Dines, and that pursuing the policy of NCND (Neither Confirming Nor Denying the identity of undercover officers) in relation to those officers is likely to only "postpone the day of reckoning" - will you formally acknowledge what is already in the public domain about these officers and confirm...

• Reference: 2014/3178
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Can you provide more information about the MOPAC covert forum, its membership, how frequently it meets and what its terms of reference are?

• Reference: 2014/3177
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Thank you for your answer to my question 2014/2752. Please can you confirm when MOPAC will publish regular high-level updates on intrusive tactics undertaken by the MPS, and confirm what intrusive tactics will be included within such updates?

• Reference: 2014/3176
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 17 September 2014

Thank you for your answer to my question 2014/2750. Please could you confirm how many intelligence records are retained by the NDEDIU?