Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Food Waste Collection in Barnet

  • Reference: 2021/3325
  • Question by: Anne Clarke
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
What is the latest update on discussions between GLA officers and Barnet Officers on the reintroduction of food waste collection?

Tube noise in Fitzrovia

  • Reference: 2021/3324
  • Question by: Anne Clarke
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
Noise persists on the Victoria Line around Fitzrovia. TfL are now undertaking noise testing in local properties – what is the general trend from these readings? Is noise rising, and if so what is the cause?

384 bus

  • Reference: 2021/3323
  • Question by: Anne Clarke
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
Has TfL assessed the impact of the changes to the 384 bus service and the impact on passengers in New Barnet?

Digital skills for older Londoners

  • Reference: 2021/3322
  • Question by: Anne Clarke
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
Recent research by Age UK London showed that one in four Londoners over the age of 65 want to use the internet more and one of the biggest barriers is a lack of skills. What steps will you take to ensure that the roll-out of the revised digital skills entitlement meets the specific needs of older Londoners?

The Williams-Shapps Rail Review (3)

  • Reference: 2021/3320
  • Question by: Elly Baker
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
Following MQ 2021/1549 can you update me on whether the transfer of the Great Northern Metro services to TfL aligns with the Williams-Shapps Plan? Please also provide details on when the Outline Business Case will be submitted to the DfT and the timeline for any transfer to TfL.

The Williams-Shapps Rail Review (2)

  • Reference: 2021/3319
  • Question by: Elly Baker
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
The 2017 Chris Gibb Report recommended the transfer of the East Croydon – Milton Keynes operation to TfL. Can you confirm if this is still something TfL and the DfT are actively considering?

The Williams-Shapps Rail Review (1)

  • Reference: 2021/3318
  • Question by: Elly Baker
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
What discussions, if any, have you held regarding the implementation of the Williams-Shapps Rail Review in London?

Accessible Cycling (3)

  • Reference: 2021/3317
  • Question by: Elly Baker
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
I understand that footpath / off-carriageway cycle track data are included in the Cycling Infrastructure Database, but which sections of track are fully accessible is not identified. What plans, if any, do you have to audit these cycle tracks to identify accessibility issues a) so cyclists know which tracks are not accessible and b) so TfL/Boroughs can seek to make them fully accessible at the earliest opportunity?

Accessible Cycling (2)

  • Reference: 2021/3316
  • Question by: Elly Baker
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
Can you confirm that all TfL branded cycle routes (cycleways, cycle superhighways and quietways) are fully accessible to all types of cycle, as per the London Cycling Design Standards concept of ‘the inclusive cycle’?

Accessible Cycling (1)

  • Reference: 2021/3315
  • Question by: Elly Baker
  • Meeting date: 09 September 2021
Local Transport Note 1/20’s ‘cycle design vehicle’ is similar to London Cycling Design Standards concept of ‘the inclusive cycle’. Can you update me on your review of the implications of the changes made in LTN 1/20 and whether the ‘inclusive cycle’ guidance needs to be updated?
Subscribe to