• Reference: 2022/1632
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

On page 47 of the Safety, Health and Environment Quarterly report 'Quarter 3 2021/22' published on the TfL website, reference is made to “105 members of our workforce who have sadly passed away from COVID-19 as of 27 January 2022”. Similar to the information you provided in your response to Questions 2020/2533, 2021/0127, 2021/0527, 2021/1967, 2021/1974, 2021/4898 and 2022/0796, please provide me with details of these 105 deaths showing: 1) sex and, if known, ethnicity; 2) date of reported death; 3) name of TfL contractor or TfL division for whom each victim worked; 4) place of work (e.g. train station...

• Reference: 2022/1631
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

Am I correct to conclude from your failure to present uniform data formats and/or data for the same information I have requested 6 times since July 2020 that TfL (a) has never had a grasp of the scale or the breadth of the problem of its contracted workers dying from Covid-19 and (b) has a policy of apparently obstructing public scrutiny on this matter?

• Reference: 2022/1630
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

In your responses to Questions 2021/0127, 2021/1974 and 2021/4898 you aggregated deaths of bus and Dial-A-Ride drivers and presented a combined total figure for both categories of driver. Are Dial-A-Ride drivers employed by bus contractors? If not, how do you explain why you’ve presented the data this way?

• Reference: 2022/1629
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

In your response to Question 2022/0796, you responded “Due to the sensitivity of information for colleagues who have passed away, TfL cannot provide a breakdown by bus contractor of the bus workers who have died due to Covid-19 related illnesses.” Since you provided precisely this information in your responses to Questions 2020/2533, 2021/0527 and 2021/1967, please provide me with (a) a breakdown of Covid-19 by bus contractor as I requested or (b) a copy of the decision memorandum or other formal instructions that can justify why this information cannot be provided to me at this time for public scrutiny.

• Reference: 2022/1628
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

Given the proposed reduction in the speed limit across the City of London it seems perverse to exclude a mode of transport with an exemplary safety record. Will the Mayor also be willing to enter into a dialogue in a bid to open up Bank Junction to the taxi industry given the taxi industry's impeccable safety record at that junction?

• Reference: 2022/1627
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

Given the proposed reduction in the speed limit across the City of London and the safety attributes that it may bring across the board, will the Mayor either remove the Bishopsgate Streetspace restrictions or – at the very least – allow taxis to now use that stretch of road during restricted hours?

• Reference: 2022/1626
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

What was the total amount of the penalties issued for the non-payment of the ULEZ charge from the 26th of January 2022 to the 25th of April 2022?

• Reference: 2022/1625
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

What was the total income from the ULEZ charges from the 26th of January 2022 to the 25th of April 2022?

• Reference: 2022/1624
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

What was the total amount of the penalties issued for the non-payment of the ULEZ charge from the 25th of October 2021 to the 25th of January 2022?

• Reference: 2022/1623
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 19 May 2022

What was the total amount of the penalties issued for the non-payment of the ULEZ charge from the 25th of July 2021 to the 24th of October 2021?