• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Will you be advising local authorities to write this into their UDPs, and if so, in the guidance that you give, and if so, will you be revising your London Plan to take account of that?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Back to planning and health considerations, do you think that ensuring adequate access to local health care should be a planning consideration when local authorities are looking at housing applications?

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Mr Mayor, we have a huge council housing stock, as you well know, in Wandsworth. If we did not look after our housing residents, we would not be in so many numbers as we are. But what I'm asking you to do is to forget Wandsworth, we can look after our own residents, but you to work with these local authorities in the East End. It is an absolute scandal. We're a country with free housing, free education. We have children with rickets, we have children with TB. And that's an absolute scandal. And you, as Mayor, the first Mayor...

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Whilst much of the information in the answer is welcome, can I ask why it was that the strategic health authorities and the Workforce Confederation, which are charged with drawing up the capacity plans, and in particular those in north east London, which are the lead authorities on regeneration issues, were not actually involved in these discussions until September, after the draft Plan had been drawn up. Surely, the logic should have been that those who have to deliver the capacity should have been involved at a much earlier stage by the Deputy Mayor and those others who are responsible...

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Is it in the public interest not to put into the public arena the key performance indicators which Capita are required to meet under that contract? I would say that of any contractor, but particularly a contractor in a scheme of controversial as this, and a contractor as controversial, frankly, as Capita is. Let's not forget that this follows on the problems with the Criminal Records Bureau and a lot of problems with other contractors in the boroughs. When Derek Turner was asked about this, he said that releasing the performance indicators would enable people who were opposed to congestion...

• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

: It seems to me, if I am allowed two bites, the first one is you are saying to Londoners, "Trust me. It is value for money, for you as Londoners, for me to keep you in the dark about the cancellation costs of this contract, because I need to prop up a capitalist company". Is that the case?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

I'd like to just draw your attention to an evasion exercise that was carried out by Transport for London, working with the DVLA, which was reported to your Street Management Sub-Committee this month, where they stated that, "Negotiations are underway in respect of developing a persistent evader and ringer"s database, and the London-wide vehicle removal capability to maximise the enforcement effort'. It seems a bit close to the congestion charge coming in, in less than three months' time for you still to be having negotiations underway in respect of doing those things.

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Of course those costs won't be academic, if the charge goes wrong and we actually have to close it down. There there'll be a very real cost on Londoners. What I am concerned about this morning is the potential for the charge to turn into an evaders' charter, if we can't actually keep track of those people who don't register their vehicles in London. There are a lot of them. Are you satisfied that your technology and your scheme will be able to do that?

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

My concern was as to whether it extended beyond TfL.

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

We may soon get to a point where this particular contract becomes academic, but TfL's approach to contract is something which will be an issue for ever, for as long as ever Transport for London. My concern is that the default mode is that these matters are in the public arena, except for instance when you are negotiating a contract, when clearly you have to be careful what you might be giving away. You have talked about information being shared within Transport for London. Has the contract been seen or has any of this information been passed to or discussed...