Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Legacy (Supplementary) [9]

  • Question by: Dee Doocey
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
Can I come back to some of the specifics? Take the Eastway Users' Group specifically, which is what my prime concern is about and about which, as you know, I have been negotiating quite a lot with your officials. First of all your officials told me that British Cycling was in favour of the application that you had put in. British Cycling told me last night that they are certainly not in favour of it, and they referred me to their website. Their website describes the plans that you have as `unacceptable' and I understand from them that that has...

Legacy (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
So there will be a tenant, somebody who will use that facility afterwards?

Legacy (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
It is just a quick one. I understand that the delay at Hog Hill has been caused by you finding a particular wildlife there that needs to be preserved, and there has been six months delay to date. Can you guarantee us that it will not be a year's delay or 18 months' delay? Where are we with that?

Legacy (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
Right. Another example would be the white water canoeing facility where, again, to have a national venue which can be used for international competitions every now and again is a very real and obvious aspiration for the national body, but to have a facility that at the same time can train people up to become tomorrow's Olympic athletes is sometimes going to be in conflict with that. I do not want specific answers about specific venues, but how are you going to make sure and be able to demonstrate to us that you have balanced those in a way that...

Legacy (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Brian Coleman
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
Sorry, can you enlighten us as to what wildlife?

Legacy (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
I have had some involvement in this issue, and life is never quite as straightforward as it might seem. I think we should note that the cyclists, quite rightly, in a consultation, rejected an option for relocation to Enfield which, although it was very strongly opposed by them for a range of good reasons, did have a fundamentally different configuration from the arrangements we now have in front of us. I think it is also interesting that in a press release that came out today the British Cycling Chief Executive says, `The Olympic Velopark will be a huge boost to...

Legacy (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Dee Doocey
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
When I was in the negotiations with the LDA it was never, ever suggested that the track that the Eastway Users' Group would go back to would be on two sides of a main road. I can assure you. I was there. It was never even suggested.

Legacy (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Dee Doocey
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
I still find it extraordinary that your idea of producing facilities that are at least as good includes a facility of a road racing track that is both sides of a main road. That is just ludicrous.

Legacy (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
  • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
What about the International Broadcast Centre and the Media and Press Centre? You are going to build a huge facility there. What happens when the circus has moved on, what are you going to do with it?

Achievements from the GLA's Work on the Economic Promotion of London (Supplementary) [15]

  • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
  • Meeting date: 14 March 2007
Can I just deal with the John Hutton point. It is indeed welcome. What is not welcome is it took a question from me, after the Mayor had announced the scheme, for anybody in your office to wake up to the fact there was an issue here that needed to be checked out.
Subscribe to