Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Free Travel for Under 16s and 18s (6) (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
Mr Mayor, you could have, through your budget and your agreements with the Metropolitan Police and, indeed, your relationship with BTP (British Transport Police) actually employed a larger number of full time warranted officers. Why did you choose to go to PCSOs?

Free Travel for Under 16s and 18s (6) (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Andrew Pelling
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
Just one question. I am very pleased that there is a growing cross party consensus that this is an important issue of trying to police the impact of the free travel on allowing gangs a greater facility to move around London on public transport. I am grateful to Stephen Pound and to Val Shawcross, and we know that other Labour MPs in London are also worried about this issue. Do you think that 387 officers, in the end, is really going to be sufficient? If I can quote some of the problems we have had in Croydon with the gang...

Free Travel for Under 16s and 18s (6) (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
You appear to have shifted that debate away from the point I was making on the buses, which are your responsibility, quite neatly there. Just to shift back to the buses, people who travel on them now expect that the cameras are watching over them. That is what your advertising campaign said. I receive a surprising number of complaints from people who have a crime committed against them and then find that the CCTV pictures are ineffective either because the system was not working, or because the lighting was not working. There is a problem here which I think you...

Free Travel for Under 16s and 18s (6) (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
£60 million. How does that square with your claim that each of the people travelling will save £350?

Over ground trains revenue protection (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Geoff Pope
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
Into 2010?

Over ground trains revenue protection (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Geoff Pope
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
Three years is not good enough, and I am very disappointed.

Over ground trains revenue protection (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Geoff Pope
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
Yes.

Over ground trains revenue protection (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Geoff Pope
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
What are you doing to try and get an agreement as quickly as possible?

Over ground trains revenue protection (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
I have to say that that minimalist answer - I appreciate it is the train operators who are refusing information - but I think it demonstrates that there is not any degree of coordination between the Mayor's Office and the Labour Assembly Group on answers, because had I had a chance to write your reply, Mayor.

Over ground trains revenue protection (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Geoff Pope
  • Meeting date: 21 March 2007
The ATOC (Association of Train Operating Companies) statement at the end of January was welcomed, but in fact it was only a support in principle for delivering the pay as you go Oyster system which Londoners get so annoyed about. One of the biggest issues for Londoners is that they cannot use their Oyster card on the overground services. Can you tell me when this is now going to be implemented, in view of the delay?
Subscribe to