• Reference: 2024/0974
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Your response to question 2024/0787 raises some serious questions about TfL's oversight of passenger safety at Tube stations, specifically at High Barnet Station where, on 30 September 2022, a female passenger suffered life changing injuries after falling onto the tracks unnoticed by station staff or Tube employees until two Tube trains had struck her. Your response stated, "the customer risk assessments on London Underground detail specific hazards, the risks associated with these and the mitigation measures that are in place to manage them" while the victim's statements on the 4 January 2024 Jeremy Vine Programme indicate clearly that the 'mitigation...

• Reference: 2024/0973
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Will you provide me with a copy of the Health & Safety Risk Register for High Barnet Tube Station on 1 January 2023?

• Reference: 2024/0972
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Will you provide me with a copy of the Health & Safety Risk Register for High Barnet Tube Station on 1 September 2022?

• Reference: 2024/0971
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Following up on your response to question 2024/0784, will you provide me with the following detailed information for the 54 incidents where people were injured by a bus at a bus stop from 5 May 2016 to 31 December 2023? Date of Incident Bus Station Route Operator Borough Injury Result Description (e.g. sent to hospital) Victim's Sex Victim's Age Incident Event Type (e.g. Collision) Victim Casualty Category (e.g. pedestrian)

• Reference: 2024/0970
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Following up on your response to question 2024/0783, will you provide me with the following detailed information for the 233 incidents where people were injured by a bus at a bus station from 5 May 2016 to 31 December 2023? Date of Incident Bus Station Route Operator Borough Injury Result Description (e.g. 87 sent to hospital) Victim's Sex Victim's Age Incident Event Type (e.g. Collision) Victim Casualty Category (e.g. pedestrian)

• Reference: 2024/0969
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Have LTNs ever been discussed at the un-minuted and unscrutinised secretive Safety Bus Meetings that TfL hosts with its bus contractors every quarter?

• Reference: 2024/0968
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

Your response to question 2024/0193 suggests that, before the introduction of LTNs by boroughs, TfL itself does not routinely undertake impact assessments of proposed LTN on traffic flows and traffic light timings both within the borough and these actions' potential impact on bus speeds on TLRN roads. Do you agree with me this is a serious omission, given that although the LTNs might be on roads controlled by the boroughs, they clearly have significant impacts on roads in the TLRN?

• Reference: 2024/0967
• Question by: Neil Garratt
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

"City Hall last night insisted the trips were essential to share best practice learn from other cities and build partnerships". What specifically did your Night Czar learn from her trips to places such as Sydney, Bologna and Madrid? How will her approach change as a result of what she's learnt? If she were to continue to serve for another Mayoral term, what would you look to change or improve about her targets?

• Reference: 2024/0966
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

In November 2023 I wrote to you, noting that the NHS will have to spend nearly £65 million in order to make ambulances ULEZ compliant and asking that you extend the ULEZ exemption for ambulances well beyond October 2025. Your Deputy Mayor replied to that letter on 7 February, making clear that you have no plans to move the date when the exemption expires. Do you believe that spending nearly £65 million on replacing London Ambulances with newer models represents the best way for the NHS to spend that money and will you please strongly consider an extension to beyond...

• Reference: 2024/0965
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 15 March 2024

The redacted 17 November 2023 Tripartite Meeting minutes you provided in your response to question 2024/0175 show a date of Friday 17 November 2022, which, I trust, is incorrect. Since this document now forms part of the public record, can you ensure that the correct year is reflected in the document that is both circulated to attendees and also posted on the GLA’s MQT database website?