Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

NICE public health guidance PH41 on Walking and Cycling (4)

  • Reference: 2012/4031
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Is the Mayor aware that achieving the health benefits of increased walking and cycling set out in the NICE guidance will require the active support of the Metropolitan Police and the City of London Police? Will he ensure that the Police pay attention to this guidance, in order to ensure that its impact is maximised for the benefit of Londoners?

NICE public health guidance PH41 on Walking and Cycling (3)

  • Reference: 2012/4030
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Does the Mayor see any conflict between his 'Smoothing Traffic Flow' initiative and NICE's statement in its 'Walking and Cycling' guidance, under Recommendation 3, that Pedestrians and cyclists should be given priority over motorised transport, in line with the Department for Transport's 'Manual for Streets' and 'Manual for Streets 2 - wider application of the principles' from the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation?

NICE public health guidance PH41 on Walking and Cycling (2)

  • Reference: 2012/4029
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
What steps are the Mayor and TfL taking to implement the recently published NICE Guidance on Walking and Cycling?

NICE public health guidance PH41 on Walking and Cycling (1)

  • Reference: 2012/4028
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
What does the Mayor see as the number one barrier in London to implementing the recently published NICE Guidance on Walking and Cycling?

Barnet Outsourcing Programme

  • Reference: 2012/4027
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Does the Mayor share the concerns of former Assembly Member, Brian Coleman about the outsourcing programme being pursued by the London Borough of Barnet which, in my opinion, has no mandate, given as I believe no mention of it was made during the Local Council elections and for which there has been no consent from the electorate, given consultation has not taken place and little information has been provided to residents over such a radical privatisation programme? Are you concerned about the wider implications for Londoners should other local authorities choose to go down a similar route?

Residential Moorings (4)

  • Reference: 2012/4026
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Does the Mayor see value in the opportunity to support the growth of sustainable, cohesive communities on and around London's waterways by leveraging in the skills of those who live on them?

Residential Moorings (3)

  • Reference: 2012/4025
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Does the Mayor know about innovative approaches to residential moorings like CHUG in Kingsland Basin and Hermitage Wharf on the Thames, both of which are cooperative communities that provide a valuable sense of place to the communities they touch?

Residential Moorings (2)

  • Reference: 2012/4024
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Does the Mayor see an opportunity to provide low cost housing by supporting the development of appropriate long term mooring sites?

Residential Moorings (1)

  • Reference: 2012/4023
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Is the Mayor aware of the issues continuous cruisers on London's canals face in finding appropriate long term residential moorings and will he commit to using his powers and influence to help secure appropriate sites for residential moorings?

Tooting Bec Gardens/Streatham High Road/Mitcham Lane junction safety review

  • Reference: 2012/4022
  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 19 December 2012
Although TfL's decision to implement a new signal strategy at the junction of Tooting Bec Gardens/Streatham High Road/Mitcham Lane is welcome, in light of another recent collision here, will TfL now urgently bring forward its safety review of this junction, currently scheduled for April 2013?
Subscribe to