• Reference: 2012/4068
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

What steps are you taking to address and highlight problems of Low Pay in London? Which of your strategies seeks to address this issue?

• Reference: 2012/4067
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

Do you support UCL's plans for a new campus at Stratford? Will you join me in supporting the view that if this proceeds, promises made to residents should be honoured?

• Reference: 2012/4066
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

Will you join me, and the local authority, in pursuing avenues for funding improvements to Barking Station, a Network Rail station, also housing Underground and Overground services, and where crowding and access issues remain unresolved?

• Reference: 2012/4065
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

What steps have you taken to secure the funding needed for extra school places in London? What further steps will you be taking to address this vital need?

• Reference: 2012/4064
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

In answer to 2581/2012 you advised that a restructure was underway, with the plans to be finalised. Can you now answer the question?

• Reference: 2012/4063
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

Following the precedent of the Olympic Village, for what other housing schemes in London have you secured rights of nomination for the GLA? And can you publish the 'protocol' or policy framework that guides these nominations? With who was there consultation in drawing up this protocol/policy and over what period did this consultation take place?

• Reference: 2012/4062
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

What proportion of the Olympic Village will be 'affordable' under your definition? What proportion of the 'affordable housing' element of the former Olympic Village will be available, for rent? And what proportion of former Olympic housing will be 'social rented' and will be available, on nomination, to households who will need housing benefit towards their rent?

• Reference: 2012/4061
• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

Waltham Forest Community Safety Board have recently contacted me regarding your plans for new Safer Neighbourhood Boards. They ask that you answer the following question in detail: Do you accept that the role of Independent Advisory Groups and Community Engagement Groups are totally different and therefore should not be merged into one single body?

• Reference: 2012/4060
• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

Waltham Forest Community Safety Board have recently contacted me regarding your plans for new Safer Neighbourhood Boards. They ask that you answer the following question in detail: Community Engagement Groups currently hold meetings which are fully open to members of the public. How will the Safer Neighbourhood Boards be able to do this if they are considering complaints against police officers, details of custody visitors and issues arising from them, etc?

• Reference: 2012/4059
• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 19 December 2012

Waltham Forest Community Safety Board have recently contacted me regarding your plans for new Safer Neighbourhood Boards. They ask that you answer the following question in detail: What arrangements are MOPAC to put in place to ensure the new structure of Safer Neighbourhood Boards is fully accessible to all members of the community?