• Reference: 2024/4020
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

In a letter from the Head of Programme Management in your Housing and Land team to the Chair of the London Assembly Budget and Performance Committee, dated 25 October 2023, they said: “the GLA is estimating that £173.5m of the funding approved for projects in the Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 will be applied to homes replacing obsolete units.” What is the latest estimate of how much AHP 2021-26 funding is going towards replacing ‘obsolete’ units, and how many units does this equate to?

• Reference: 2024/4019
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

On Wednesday 23 October, the Minister for Housing and your Deputy Mayor for Housing and Residential Development held a roundtable on increasing supply of housing in London. Will you publish the minutes of this meeting?

• Reference: 2024/4018
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Constituents in Enfield have raised concerns that Whitewebbs Park was not recognised as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) by their council in its latest review in 2020, despite it being an ecologically rich area, surrounded by and connecting other SINCs. Residents are concerned that this means its conservation value will not be adequately considered in a proposed development on the park, currently being considered by the council. Given you define how SINCs should be selected via your Environment Strategy could you tell me: a) what assessment did you make of Enfield’s decision not to award this area...

• Reference: 2024/4017
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

You launched your £50 million Estate Regeneration Fund in October 2024, to accelerate development on ‘stalled’ sites. Could you provide information on: a) how many bids you have received to date, b) what sites they relate to, c) whether they have been successful, and d) how much funding has been allocated in total?

• Reference: 2024/4016
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

In a report published by the GLA on 11 November 2024, you outlined the benefits falling house prices in London could have on economic productivity. What steps are you planning to take to help precipitate a steady decline in house prices in London?

• Reference: 2024/4015
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Thank you for your answers to MQ 2024/3242 and MQ 2024/3243, in which you described the range of data collected by the High Streets Data Service. Will you provide Assembly Members with access to the Service, so we can better understand data collected and associated methodologies on behalf of our constituents?

• Reference: 2024/4014
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

The Baroness Casey Review said that despite the high levels of disability discrimination and employment tribunals relating to disability issues, with the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) not showing ‘sufficient curiosity as to why this apparent pattern has emerged’, and ‘no willingness to learn from these cases’. Could you tell me a) what is the MPS doing to counter the lack of curiosity regarding the high number of disability discrimination cases and employment tribunals, b) what Disabled representatives are being consulted, c) what policy and practices are being changed in the MPS, and d) how the MPS is responding differently to...

• Reference: 2024/4013
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

How is the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) informing Londoners about the work it is doing to improve how disability and Disablism is treated in the MPS?

• Reference: 2024/4012
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Does the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) have the support of the MPS Disability Staff Association to create root and branch reform of Disablist attitudes and practices in the MPS?

• Reference: 2024/4011
• Question by: Zoë Garbett
• Meeting date: 19 December 2024

What action has the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) taken on the recommendations made by Inclusion London in their response to both the A New Met for London Plan and the Baroness Casey Review?