• Reference: 2015/0089
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Can you confirm the average annual household income of those accessing low cost home ownership in London in 2013/14?

• Reference: 2015/0088
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Do you accept that the designation of a site as an 'Opportunity Area' does not in itself provide any grounds to increase densities over the existing Density Matrix guidelines?

• Reference: 2015/0087
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

When can we expect you to publish your review into whether the London Plan's existing strategies are sufficient to accommodate the envisaged level of growth in London?

• Reference: 2015/0086
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Do the comments made by the Planning Inspector who assessed your Further Alterations to the London Plan - in which he encouraged you to engage with local planning authorities beyond the GLA's boundaries to assess the options for future growth - suggest there is a limit to London's housing capacity?

• Reference: 2015/0085
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Further to the statement made by the Planning Inspector who assessed your Further Alterations to the London Plan that "the evidence before me strongly suggests that the existing strategy will not deliver sufficient homes to meet objectively assessed need", is it now time to consider a much more ambitious affordable home building programme?

• Reference: 2015/0084
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Do you regret not engaging constructively with adjoining waste planning authorities in formulating your further alterations to the London Plan?

• Reference: 2015/0083
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

How many applications have been received to date for your Custom Build Housing and Community Right to Build programmes? Please also clarify how much of the capital funding awarded to the GLA to support these programmes has been spent?

• Reference: 2015/0082
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

Is it right to describe the Garden Bridge as a piece of "transport infrastructure" given it will only reduce pedestrian journey times by an average of 25 seconds?

• Reference: 2015/0081
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

How do you respond to the news that the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) has withdrawn its support for the Garden Bridge, citing the high costs of the project?

• Reference: 2015/0080
• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

In answer to MQ2014/5109, you stated that any compensation offered to tenants who suffered financially as a result of the attempted disposal of MOPAC-owned properties in Raynesfield would be a matter for Crown Simmons Ltd to consider as landlord. However, it is clear that many of the substantial (and unnecessary) moving and storage costs incurred by residents could have been avoided if your Deputy Mayor's decision to halt eviction proceedings had been taken and communicated earlier in the process. Given MOPAC's direct responsibility for this situation, is it not right that you now consider offering compensation?