Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Catsback Bridge (1)

  • Reference: 2017/0065
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Catsback pedestrian bridge will be replaced in the new year but there will be no provision for cycling, despite the bridge's location on the quietway 4 route. As a result, cyclists will be put through the inconvenience of dismounting and the danger of re-routing onto nearby busy roads. Why will a new bridge be installed on a quietway when that bridge will not be made safe for cycling and walking?

167 bus route truncation (6)

  • Reference: 2017/0064
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Davenant Foundation School and Debden Park High School are concerned that students could be deterred from attending after-school revision sessions or extra-curricular activities as the proposed new timings for the 677 bus service are unsuitable. Were these schools involved in discussion with Transport for London (TfL) on the timings for this route?

167 bus route truncation (5)

  • Reference: 2017/0063
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Essex County Council has asked Transport for London (TfL) to consider actively encouraging alternative methods of service provision on the 167 route, such as encouraging commercial operation with a permit for operation in London, and has offered to cooperate with TfL in this regard. Will you ask TfL to work with Essex County Council and with local residents to explore the feasibility of such a solution?

167 bus route truncation (4)

  • Reference: 2017/0062
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
What would be the annual cost to Transport for London (TfL) of continuing to run the 167 bus route between Loughton station and Debden station?

167 bus route truncation (3)

  • Reference: 2017/0061
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Eighty-one per cent of respondents to the consultation on the future of the 167 bus service said that truncating this route will make their journeys longer. Has Transport for London (TfL) assessed the likelihood that local residents may decide to switch to making their trip by car instead of bus as a result of the changes it is proposing? If so, will you provide me with the results?

167 bus route truncation (2)

  • Reference: 2017/0060
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Will you ask Transport for London (TfL) to release the minutes of all meetings it held with Essex County Council prior to the decision to truncate the 167 bus route?

167 bus route truncation (1)

  • Reference: 2017/0059
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
What modelling has Transport for London (TfL) carried out into the potential increased use of the hopper ticket as a result of the proposed truncation of the 167 bus route? Please provide me with the results.

Archway buses (4)

  • Reference: 2017/0058
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Will you improve access to the Girdlestone Estate and Whittington Hospital by allowing the 41 (and 210 if still diverted) to pick up and set down in Macdonald Road?

Archway buses (3)

  • Reference: 2017/0057
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Will you provide a bus stop at the bottom of Archway Road (formerly stop G) to serve all northbound buses from a single point to maximise opportunities for passengers to catch a bus?

Archway buses (2)

  • Reference: 2017/0056
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 18 January 2017
Will you provide a bus stop on Highgate Hill immediately above MacDonald Road to serve all routes towards Highgate (143, 210, 271, W5) allowing passengers to wait in one location to travel in this direction?
Subscribe to