• Reference: 2019/4052
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

Please provide a breakdown of all external or outsourced medical, pathological or digital forensic services used by the Metropolitan Police each year since 2015 and to date in 2018/19, including the names of companies used and the amount spent with each.

• Reference: 2019/4051
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

In response to Question No: 2018/5122 on the Gangs Matrix you stated a Data Protection Impact Assessment had been drafted and would be published on the Metropolitan Police website by the end of January 2019. Please provide a copy of this.

• Reference: 2019/4050
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

Please set out the reasons why TfL did not think that the company Grainger PLC had a conflict of interest, when acting both as a guarantor for Quarterbridge/Market Asset Management and being contracted to work them?

• Reference: 2019/4049
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

What was the process and due diligence that took place when renewing the lease for Quarterbridge /MAM (Market Asset Management) in 2017?

• Reference: 2019/4048
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

What monitoring have TfL undertaken of the complaints levelled against Quarterbridge /MAM (Market Asset Management).

• Reference: 2019/4047
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

I understand that following an investigation into their behaviour the market’s leaseholder merely provided an apology and a promise to not repeat past behaviour. When they did not honour this promise and the behaviour did not improve why did TfL not reopen the investigation?

• Reference: 2019/4046
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

Are you satisfied that TfL's investigation into traders’ complaints about the market leaseholder/market manager's behaviour was properly undertaken?

• Reference: 2019/4045
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

Why was the review concluded on 4 September 2018 only published five months later on the 12 February 2019?

• Reference: 2019/4044
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

Minute No. 46/09/17 from 22 November 2017 Safety Sustainability and Human Resources [SSHR] Panel Actions List stipulates that the then Surface Transport Managing Director was responsible for providing SSHR panel members with a “timeline of the fatigue management audit work carried out on First Group”. When was this timeline provided to SSHR Panel Members? Please provide a copy of this timeline.

• Reference: 2019/4043
• Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
• Meeting date: 25 February 2019

The most recent passenger figures for the Emirates cable car show that just 13,653 passengers used it during the week ending the 9 February and only 12,790 passengers used it during the week ending the 2 February. Do you think TfL’s ongoing advertising campaign for the Emirates cable car is having any positive impact and can be justified in light of such poor passenger figures.