• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

So my point about transport considerations, all of the planning considerations one would normally expect, is that what you're saying?

• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

Could I ask you if I'm correct in putting that in slightly different terms, which is that you're suggesting that the arrangements for planning in London which need to take the public with them must support the application of new technologies? Because to say it must fit in to the SDS sounds as if you're suggesting that there is some technical criterion to be reached.

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

But you will take seriously the Environment Committee's recommendation to look at non-thermal new technologies?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

Have you considered any other non-thermal new technologies? Are you looking at any of those, such as mechanical biological treatment?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

So in terms of dealing with the residual waste, if you could deal with residual waste using non-thermal new technologies, would that be your preference?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

Of course there are new technologies and new technologies. In the Environmental Committee's scrutiny report it talks about some alternatives to thermal treatment as part of new technologies and the Mayor looking into that to deal with residual waste issues. How do we intend to take that recommendation forward?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

So you think there's generally no problem then? It's the sort of plant that you'd like to see research in for getting in to London then?

• Question by: Samantha Heath
• Meeting date: 14 November 2001

Thank you. In some of the words that you've been speaking this morning you referred very frequently to "my officers" and words like that. Do you therefore think that the strategy staff should be under the Mayoral corridor as opposed to in the core GLA?

• Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
• Meeting date: 23 May 2001

When the Mayor goes on his campaigning in the general election - having reached this incredible deal with Millbank to try to keep the Tories out of London, I suppose - what staff will he take with him, and what are the political restrictions on his own staff? In particular, what are the political restrictions on his own staff in terms of writing articles? I am referring specifically to an article in The Independent accusing the Tory party generally of racism. What is the position of that, given that that member of staff is a paid official of the GLA...

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 23 May 2001

This is your adviser - not the political parties.