Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Congestion Charge (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Sally Hamwee
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
My colleague, Jenny Tonge, who piloted the original bill, tells met hat the divers were getting very irritated that it was taking so long. And one of the things, of course, that they wanted to see, and I think the public want to see, is a way of knowing, by looking at the cab, that it is licensed, looking at the car. There's something on the outside on the livery. I know this has exercised you but what progress is being made in seeing that this can be achieved?

Congestion Charge (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
So, by 17 February next year, every mini-cab driving into central London will be able to get an exemption from the congestion charge, whether or not they're on mini-cab business?

Congestion Charge (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
But currently, mini-cabs are not licensed, mini-cab drivers are not licensed. I'd be delighted if today you're announcing that if, by some means, you are going to give them interim recognition, so they can be exempted, but I think otherwise, this is a very big problem for London.

Congestion Charge (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
I was waiting for the answer, and it didn't come, which is how many mini-cabs will be exempt from the charge, when it comes in on 17 February next year?

Thames Gatewat Road Bridge (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
Are you going to sack any of those people, or have any of them threatened to resign?

Thames Gatewat Road Bridge (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
Which members of the TfL board opposed you yesterday?

Thames Gatewat Road Bridge (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
Do you accept that there are some serious concerns on the TfL board now, given that half of them refused to back you on this?

Thames Gatewat Road Bridge (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
My question concerns the survey work, because certainly from our side, we are strongly supportive of the measures to regenerate the Thames Gateway area and are convinced that river crossings are necessary to achieve that. The question is really around how best to do that. I was, therefore, interested to see your survey which appears to show that only 2% of respondents are against the bridge. I have to say that figure is incredibly low. You get a higher percentage rating for people who would answer yes to the question whether the moon was made of cheese. 2% is below...

Thames Gatewat Road Bridge (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
Why did you refuse to allow a vote on alternative proposals to be forwarded, an amendment by Dave Wetzel at yesterday's TfL Board meeting, which would have allowed, as part of the public consultation process, alternative proposals to be put forward as well as the road river crossings? Why did you refuse to allow that amendment and then have to railroad through your proposals for a road river crossing, when there was a 50/50 split, and yet you had to railroad it through on the Chair's casting vote?

Mayor's Report (Supplementary) [27]

  • Question by: Brian Coleman
  • Meeting date: 20 November 2002
So, is the Mayor urging them to work normally until the enquiry comes out?
Subscribe to