Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
We accept totally the case for the Lower Lea Valley and all the rest of it. All we are asking quite simply is what are these `adjustments `and `indicative funding" and all the other terminology and has anything actually been delayed or lost out because this has greater priority. That is all; it is quite simple; there is no need to hide it.

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
Yes, and we accept that. In a sense I am being taken around the round-about here, am I not?

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
So 25% of your future funding, which would have gone to other communities, has been adjusted to the Olympics?

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
Do you have a figure for the size of the adjustment?

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
My apologies. Can you explain?

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
So, if I get the terminology right, there has been indicative funding for various projects, which are now not getting indicative funding because it is going to the Olympics. That is how I understand it.

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
So could we be provided with a list of the broad and notional projects which encompass the 25% of LDA future possible spend which might have been included if the Olympics were not? Would that be possible?

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [15]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
I take that, but I am interested in looking at ways in which the wider London community through its many strengths such as the diversity of London, the aspirations of struggling communities in London, can be built into this bid, both to give Londoners a buy-in to it and to make it an attractive bid to the IOC.

Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [14]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
But I see this as being possibly an integral and an attractive part of the bid.
Subscribe to