Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [15]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Well, I will be a pain in your arse or a thorn in your side throughout this period promoting the congestion charge. You mentioned measurement of public support and you mentioned MORI. Would you also put ORC International within that same category and the public opinion poll you've conducted over the Ealing tram? Would I be right in assuming that you only publish figures in a manner which is favourable to yourself; not necessarily honest to the outcome of that survey? Can I couple to that why it will not be before at least August this year that I get...

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [14]

  • Question by: Richard Barnes
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Can I say, Mr Mayor, how much I welcome your clear and unequivocal statement about congestion charging around Heathrow? I am ensuring that it gets as much publicity as it deserves. Can you explain to me how you are going to fulfil your passion for consultation around Heathrow? Who are you going to consult and how?

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [13]

  • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
My question is about consultation and about improvements to the A406 around Bounds Green. Ken, can I take you back to the TfL board meeting that you chaired this week: would you agree with me and others present that it seemed clear to us that TfL officers had developed their proposals, that were in front of you and the board, around one set of options, namely, traffic calming measures and that they had completely ignored, or had not paid a lot of attention, to the views of residents? They were there and they were quite upset. It was clear that...

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [12]

  • Question by: Meg Hillier
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
I am asking, the people who turned up for meetings, what feedback did they get about the consultation meetings that they attended and how their work, or that meeting, influenced the strategies?

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [11]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
And you will be telling them that?

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [10]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
But it will be a six-lane dual carriageway.

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [9]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Why are you trying to make out that this bridge is just a small local link and not part of the major strategic road network?

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
We're not talking about demolishing bridges --

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
In the consultation on the Thames Gateway road river crossing, will you be open about the fact that it's a six-lane dual carriageway, a major strategic road, that's being proposed and not just a local link?

Public Consultation (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Graham Tope
  • Meeting date: 26 March 2003
Staying with the Cultural Strategy, what do you expect to learn from the consultation part of this process and what issues are you prepared to change your mind on if the consultation demonstrates that that's what you should do?
Subscribe to