• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

In a previous answer just before Christmas you said that London Remade were targeting to create 2,000 green jobs by March 2004. That's another 8,000 to find between March 2004 and May 2005. Do you think you'll make that?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

Do you think you will be on course to create 10,000 new jobs in green industries by 2005?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

What we're suggesting is that you would make the process much more transparent if people had access to you to put their case so that that is at least directly implanted from them into your head so that they can be aware that you've had their points in mind when you and you alone, as is entirely correct under the Act, go through the process of making the decision. That's how it's seen to be transparent, that both sides have full access.

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

In that event, why won't you be free with the people who object to planning applications as the Assembly, on a cross-party basis, suggested to you and give them accessibility so that you are seen to behave as - if you will forgive the old phrase - Caesar's wife in these matters, and there can't be any suspicion that the most important executive power you hold is exercised in anything other than a completely transparent open book fashion?

• Question by: Bob Neill
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

I hope the question is not too specific. It has already been referred to: that is to say, your very specific commitment to - I think the full quote was - "To create the most open and transparent form of government that this country has yet seen" in this organisation. How do you reconcile that with a situation in which you tell us today that consultation is absorbed by your officers by what appears to be a process of osmosis; Members of the Assembly are told that they will be treated differentially according to whether they support the Mayor or...

• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

Excuse me, Ken, had Transport for London answered these questions that were put in a long time ago, in detail, in writing, I would not have to even bring them here and you are Chair of Transport for London.

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

I think the issue of unaccompanied children is a pretty important detail.

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

One of the important issues you told us previously was going to be in the Children's Strategy is the very important issue - which I suspect may become even more important in weeks and months ahead - of unaccompanied children. Can you confirm that is in the Strategy that is on your desk?

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

That is indeed good news. As you started by telling us there was nothing that was not delivered, can you tell us how late this delivery is? About 18 months?

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 26 March 2003

I think you're about to receive a message.