Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Future Staffing (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
So, you have not really done any preparatory work on, for instance, the new requirements that may be there for the London Skills and Employment Board?

Future Staffing (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
What about the other areas? Are you saying that a lot of it is going to be done from the GLA?

Future Staffing (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
Just to be clear, I think the understanding of all of us is that where we are given extra powers, through the extension of powers review, where extra work comes to this tier of government, there will be the extra funding there to ensure that we can carry out that job properly. The idea that we are going to tell you off for taking on extra staff, providing they are funded out of extra funding, that automatically follows on from the extra powers surely.

Future Staffing (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
So does that suggest that you do not necessarily see your requirements to take on any extra staff?

Future Staffing (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Angie Bray
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
: Can I just say that I am slightly surprised that you do not seem to have yet identified what staff needs you may need to have, because if this comes to you, and some of the mayoral extension of powers are less controversial than others, and I would suggest this may be one of them where it is very likely to happen, you are going to need to be hitting the spot running are you not, so surely you must be anxious to move on and identify your staff needs and get on with it?

Olympics (Supplementary) [15]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
I am just looking at the aspects that we have already talked about, barriers to employment and worklessness and here are 2,000 jobs that are real, actually in place, that are under threat.

Olympics (Supplementary) [14]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
That is 9,000, of which we have got 23 per cent secured.

Olympics (Supplementary) [13]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
Well, we will note that in the transcript here and see whether that is true. In terms of the CPO process, you have given us the figures of 93 per cent already in public ownership, I think, and 7 per cent still remaining. What is happening about progressing the CPO process with those and the other issues of land assembly below 7 per cent still to be obtained?

Olympics (Supplementary) [12]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
You have given percentages. How many jobs overall are we talking about here?

Olympics (Supplementary) [11]

  • Question by: Bob Blackman
  • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
Yes, but we are still talking about a large number of jobs that are under threat, potentially, if relocation does not take place.
Subscribe to