Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Embedding a healthy streets approach within TfL (3)

  • Reference: 2016/4551
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
Will the Transport for London (TfL) Commissioner include updates on the delivery of the Health Action Plan in his reports to the TfL board, in the same way that he provides updates on the tube, buses etc? If not, how will progress be tracked?

Embedding a healthy streets approach within TfL (2)

  • Reference: 2016/4550
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
Which Transport for London (TfL) Board committee will have oversight and ownership of its revised Health Action Plan?

Embedding a healthy streets approach within TfL (1)

  • Reference: 2016/4549
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
Which Transport for London (TfL) director will be held accountable for the implementation of its revised Health Action Plan?

Cycle superhighway 6 extension

  • Reference: 2016/4548
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
If the north-south cycle superhighway (cycle superhighway 6) were extended 0.5 miles, it could link to the proposed Westminster Bridge south scheme and thus the east-west cycle superhighway. Is this option being actively considered by Transport for London (TfL)?

Average speed camera trials

  • Reference: 2016/4547
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
What plans do you have to enact further average speed camera trials on sections of the Transport for London (TfL) road network in inner and central London?

Walking and cycling commissioner

  • Reference: 2016/4546
  • Question by: Caroline Russell
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
When will you announce the appointment of your new walking and cycling commissioner?

Barking to Gospel Oak train line

  • Reference: 2016/4542
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
A TfL press release dated the 20th September 2016 states: "Network Rail is carrying out major work including lowering four major sections of track, installing structures to carry the overhead wires and rebuilding four bridges. The first phase of the work started in June with no service between South Tottenham and Barking during weekdays and a full line closure at weekends. From Saturday 24 September to February 2017, a full closure in both directions from Gospel Oak to Barking is necessary to carry out the second phase of the work. TfL will be providing rail replacement buses, which will operate...

Bepsoke cycle buses

  • Reference: 2016/4541
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
It was recently announced that TfL will look at providing a bespoke cycle-bus which will carry cyclists and their bikes through the proposed new Silvertown road tunnel on a turn-up and go basis. Irrespective of whether the new Silvertown tunnel is built will you ensure similar facilities for cyclists are immediately considered for the Blackwall and Rotherhithe tunnels?

Publication of taxi and private hire related sexual offences

  • Reference: 2016/4540
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
While welcoming the publication on TfL's website of data relating to taxi and private hire-related sexual offences in London can detailed clarification be provided as to why the data has appeared in a different format and seemingly providing inconsistent figures than the response provided by the Metropolitan Police Service to the freedom of information request Reference No: 2016020000642.

Changes to bus services in Archway

  • Reference: 2016/4539
  • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
  • Meeting date: 14 December 2016
On the 1st December 2016 stakeholders were informed by TfL that 75% of people who had responded to the consultation did not support the proposed changes, with just 23% supporting or partially supporting the proposals, yet despite the consultation responses the proposed changes would still go ahead. Considering the overwhelming opposition to these changes do you believe TfL should at very least halt the proposed changes and reconsider why there is such high levels of opposition to the proposed changes?
Subscribe to