Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Police informants (2)

  • Reference: 2017/1837
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
What was the largest individual sum paid out to an informant from 2011 to 2016; and what result was achieved as a result of the information supplied?

Police informants (1)

  • Reference: 2017/1836
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
The Metropolitan police paid £5.2m from 2011 to 2016, more than a quarter of the amount paid out nationally, to informants. What safeguards are in place to oversee such payments?

Sick days due to depression in the Met

  • Reference: 2017/1835
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
To what do you attribute the 15% increase in sick days due to depression in the Met; and what are you doing to ameliorate this?

Restorative justice

  • Reference: 2017/1834
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
For each of the last three years, how much was MOPAC awarded by the Government for restorative justice; and what happened to any underspend?

PCN mitigation

  • Reference: 2017/1833
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
Further to Question No: 2017/0561 'In a recent case involving one of my constituents, it transpires that local authorities, who do not accept PCN appeal representations solely based on mitigating factors, are not making clear to those appealing in their rejection letters that the London Tribunal does not accept mitigating factors as a ground to cancel a PCN. Residents are thus erroneously led to make a further appeal to the Tribunal when they have zero chance of success, and so end up having to pay the full penalty fare instead of the discounted early pay rate. Will you undertake to...

Archway traffic scheme bus and motorcycle collision

  • Reference: 2017/1832
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
Are you aware that on 15 February 2017 in your new Archway traffic scheme, very recently introduced despite huge public opposition, there was a collision between a motorcyclist and a bus resulting in serious injury to the motorcyclist. In light of this crash, will you now urgently review this traffic scheme?

Camden Street

  • Reference: 2017/1831
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
Further to Question No: 2017/0253: 'The lack of pedestrian crossing on the east side of the Camden St/Camden Rd junction is proving very difficult for the school commute for children and their families from Hawley and St Martin's Primary Schools. Will you ensure that officers from TfL actively propose improvements to pedestrian crossings as part of their ongoing review of traffic flow in the area?' Your response being: 'Transport for London has undertaken design work on a scheme to reduce road danger on Camden Road. Options for improved pedestrian facilities at the junction of Camden Street and Camden Road will...

A5 bus routes

  • Reference: 2017/1830
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
TfL has decided to cut/shorten various of our bus routes especially on the A5 in spite of overwhelming opposition to all parts of their proposals and as the curtailment of the 189 leaves no step-free access to Oxford Street east of Selfridges for passengers from there thus denying access to Oxford Street to the less mobile, and with no bus going east of the main A5 from Cricklewood/Kilburn, what reassurances can you give to passengers so inconvenienced?

Pedestrian crossing in Wood Street, High Barnet

  • Reference: 2017/1829
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
Further to Question No: 2017/0563: 'What public consultation did TfL undertake with High Barnet local residents, pensioner organisations, and with any users of the crossing, particularly the parents of the numerous small children who use the playground which is just inside the Old Court House Recreation Ground, about the changes to the crossing?' Your response being: 'Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly'. Will you now provide a substantive reply?

T charge

  • Reference: 2017/1828
  • Question by: Andrew Dismore
  • Meeting date: 22 March 2017
Have Embassies and High Commissions a) been notified of the forthcoming T charge ; and b) agreed that they and their diplomatic staff should pay the T charge when introduced; c) if not why not; and d) if any have indicated they will not pay, which are they?
Subscribe to