• Reference: 2022/3467
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

In your response to Question 2022/2973, you mentioned “TfL has commissioned the University of Surrey to undertake a review of fatigue risk assessment tools.” Please provide me with the complete terms of reference and all internal communications (memorandums, emails, notes) related to the initiation and conduct of this ‘review’.

• Reference: 2022/3466
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

Following up on your response to Question 2022/2975, how would TfL publishing annual data showing ‘High Level’ outcomes of disciplinary hearings involving bus drivers involved in safety incidents that could cause (or have caused) death or serious injury “undermine the trust and safety culture that TfL is working hard to build across the bus operating companies.”? Given the stated goals of your Vision Zero Programme, why wouldn’t any bus operator that objected to such transparency and evidence of a safety culture be disqualified from participating in TfL route tenders?

• Reference: 2022/3465
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

If, as TfL has indicated, the air conditioning units on 15 percent of the buses investigated by Logistics UK failed to pass inspection in November 2021, why was this problem not fixed by summer 2022?

• Reference: 2022/3464
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

By bus operator and bus garage, please identify both the number of buses investigated for working air condition and the number of buses investigated which failed the checks, with the bus model and manufacturer identified

• Reference: 2022/3463
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

Despite your failure to answer Question 2022/2993, I have seen an email from TfL’s Bus Director which states “In November 2021, TfL conducted a review of the air conditioning units of approximately 10% of the bus fleet – over 850 buses. These inspections checked for air output and the condition of the pump/drive belts. 85% of vehicles passed the checks and where faults were identified they were reported to the relevant operators for rectification.” Please provide me with the complete Terms of Reference and all internal communications (memorandums, emails, notes) related to the initiation and conduct of this investigation, as...

• Reference: 2022/3462
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

In your response to Question 2022/1222 you stated, “TfL is not planning to pursue an independent audit of its bus safety data at this time and I have not seen evidence to suggest that an independent audit is necessary”. Yet your response to Question 2022/2994 marks the third year in a row that TfL’s Quarterly Bus Safety Data has been published months behind schedule, this year allegedly because of a “process error which resulted in this dataset not being updated alongside the other output.” Might not this year’s “process error”, following consistent delays on publishing this key Vision Zero Data...

• Reference: 2022/3461
• Question by: Keith Prince
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

Noting your non-response to Question 2022/2995, how can you reconcile the existence of a “Bus Driver Health & Well-being Programme” with the fact that TfL is not providing toilets on over 25 percent of London Bus Routes as your Mayoralty enters its sixth year?

• Reference: 2022/3458
• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

The TfL Advertising Annual Report 2021/2022 states that within the year TfL rejected 20 advertisements displaying foods and non-alcoholic drinks that were high in fat, sugar, or salt. Which specific products were these advertisements for?

• Reference: 2022/3457
• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

What work has been done under your administration to take forward the findings of the London Infrastructure Plan 2050, which was published in 2015?

• Reference: 2022/3456
• Question by: Emma Best
• Meeting date: 13 October 2022

Are any schemes on TfL, GLA, OPDC or other Functional Body land impacted by electricity infrastructure issues affecting developments in West London? If so, would you please provide details of these?