Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [8]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Therefore, you do not agree that it is desirable that 'Authorities should not use public funds to mount publicity campaigns whose primary purpose is to persuade the public to hold a particular view on a question of policy'? That is unduly restrictive?

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [7]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Why?

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [6]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Do you think it should?

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Since you are responsible, you are responsible for making sure that the Code of Local Government Publicity is adhered to, would you agree?

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
It is to do with you, whether you choose to read it or not, is it not?

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Therefore, it is no good in future saying, 'I do not know about that,' or 'I did not write it,' or 'I did not see it. It is nothing to do with me.'

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Bob Neill
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Does not that and the string of answers that we have had in the course of this morning display the most extraordinarily cavalier approach to your personal responsibility as Mayor, as the chief executive, in effect, elected of this Authority, to make sure that you take personal charge of what is issued in your name and in this Authority's name?

Londoner Article (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Sally Hamwee
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Can I go back to your first answer, Mr Mayor, rather than the content of this particular article? Can I ask you to clarify who has the final say on what appears in The Londoner, or in other words, who has editorial control of it?

Leisure facilities in Lewisham (Supplementary) [5]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
They totally created the problem. It is entirely of their own making.

Leisure facilities in Lewisham (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Darren Johnson
  • Meeting date: 17 November 2004
Can you raise this issue with Lewisham, then, a) about your concerns over the lack of leisure facilities for three years, and b) about looking at sensible options for alternative sites for new schools?
Subscribe to