Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

TfL Safety Health & Environment Committee (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
In the past you have been reluctant to make the findings in audit papers for TfL public. Will you make the results of that safety audit public?

TfL Safety Health & Environment Committee (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
This decision does send a message that perhaps the board of TfL is not as focused on safety as it should be. What sort of steps are you taking at board level to ensure that safety remains a priority for TfL?

TfL Safety Health & Environment Committee (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
Bearing in mind the incidents on the Underground in the last month or so, do you have a greater confidence or a lesser confidence in the Health and Safety Executive than you had pre the letting of the Public Private Partnership (PPP) contracts?

TfL Safety Health & Environment Committee (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Roger Evans
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
Having taken on the Underground and bearing in mind the incidents we have seen and certainly the Chancery Lane incident was preceded by a couple of other derailments that could have given us warnings, are you not concerned that by reducing the number of meetings that the board have on this, and I appreciate there are other people doing it, but it is the board who are going to be held responsible if there is a serious accident, are you not concerned that the board is less able to spot those type of trends as they develop?

'Case for London' (Supplementary) [4]

  • Question by: Toby Harris
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
Could you tell us, in your own view who is the most amenable to investing in public services? Is it Gordon Brown or Michael Howard?

'Case for London' (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
Have you given up your ambitions to lead the Labour Party?

'Case for London' (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
Thank you for your interpretation of history, on which we may beg to differ in certain parts, but let us get to the here and now. You are trying to get all this extra money out of a Government, which has pressure from other parts of this country to get money. Your particular internal discussion about going back to Labour or not going back to Labour and the divisions between various Ministers and MPs about whether they will accept you back, or might accept you back, is that not obscuring your ability to stand up for London and this extra...

'Case for London' (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
A commendable change of tone I seem to remember, was there not a reference to aliens at one stage at the Treasury in our early years? I think it included the then Chancellor, Gordon Brown.

Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [19]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
Just to clarify one issue. Obviously you are consulting on an extension into Kensington and Chelsea and part of Westminster but it has to be the case, does it not, that the consultation includes taking evidence and learning from the operation of the current scheme? So, if people in other parts of London currently affected by the scheme are of the view that it needs to be amended or we need to learn from that, you will be receptive to such comments?

Congestion Charging (Supplementary) [18]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 19 November 2003
So, how soon will we know whether or not they have lost their nerve?
Subscribe to