• Question by: Murad Qureshi
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

As and when the maintenance is brought in-house, how will asset management be dealt with? When I have travelled round the Tube lines it strikes me that a lot of potential assets have not been developed, particularly above Tube stations. For example, the area above the Bakerloo station at Maida Vale could clearly be developed for residential use, as could Holland Park on the Central Line and other places like Edgware Road. Indeed historically the LCC (London County Council) did that at Baker Street. Is that something you would wish to pursue when the maintenance is brought in-house?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

So Gordon Brown concedes that he made a complete mess of this seven years ago?

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

want to thank for that answer because you have more or less said everything I was going to say. What you are actually saying is at the moment we are using biofuels because in answer to a Mayor's Question Time question in December 2006 you said: 'Most London buses now run off a 5% biodiesel blend, the Metropolitan Service say they used 600,000 litres of biodiesel last year and the London Fire Brigade is planning to use a biofuel blend to run their vehicles as well.' What you are saying is we have not currently got a procurement policy that...

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

I want to agree with that, but how soon can we have that procurement policy though? How soon can we have that set of guidelines for them?

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

I am your sustainable transport advisor and I think I have been saying this. What really worries me is we are already using the fuels and yet we do not have any procurement policy to make sure they are safe.

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

The Inspector said that the bridge would create adverse impacts on climate and air quality - that would actually go against the objectives in your own strategy - and expressed scepticism about the degree to which it would assist regeneration. Surely the bridge, at least in its current form, is dead in the water now?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

So you are examining alternatives and modifications if you are looking at increasing toll charges. Are you looking at any of the design modifications as well?

• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 12 September 2007

The adverse effects have been highlighted through the public inquiry and the impact in actually assisting regeneration has been questioned. It is time to look at this whole thing again. TfLs budget is so very tight because of Metronet, so is this really a priority, this huge, huge costly scheme, when other projects promoting sustainable transport are actually being held back?

• Question by: Damian Hockney
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

One thing that occurs to me - and why I think it sounds like the medieval penances that I think the Greens sometimes describe it as - is that, surely, it encourages people to travel more. If you look at your own travel costs, they multiplied considerably in the last three years. Surely this is the wrong way to do it. If you are genuinely keen on putting less CO2 into the atmosphere what you will do is travel less.

• Question by: Damian Hockney
• Meeting date: 18 July 2007

You mentioned a London scheme. Could you commit to doing, as part of that, an audit of this that is open and makes clear exactly what these schemes are doing? In the meantime, can you commit to not spending any more public money on carbon offsetting until that is done?