Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

London Estate Regeneration Fund (2)

  • Reference: 2025/0225
  • Question by: James Small-Edwards
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
How will the monthly monitoring and reporting of the London Estate Regeneration Fund work, and what specific metrics will be tracked to assess the success of the funded projects?

London Estate Regeneration Fund (1)

  • Reference: 2025/0224
  • Question by: James Small-Edwards
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
How many new homes do you expect the London Estate Regeneration Fund to deliver across the 2024-2026 period? Can you break this down by tenure type (e.g., affordable, social, market housing)?

10 year Strategy for Housing and Infrastructure

  • Reference: 2025/0223
  • Question by: James Small-Edwards
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
How has the Greater London Authority engaged with the Government’s new 10-year strategies for housing and infrastructure, due to be published next Spring?

National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority

  • Reference: 2025/0222
  • Question by: James Small-Edwards
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
How would you like the Greater London Authority to engage with the new National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority?

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

  • Reference: 2025/0221
  • Question by: James Small-Edwards
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
What does the Government’s Planning and Infrastructure Bill mean for London?

National Planning Policy Framework

  • Reference: 2025/0220
  • Question by: James Small-Edwards
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
What does the new National Planning Policy Framework mean for London?

Tube Noise between Highbury and Islington and Kings Cross (7)

  • Reference: 2025/0219
  • Question by: Sem Moema
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
In response to Question 2024/4192 TfL stated that “site-specific factors may require a more granular approach when analysing the data and ultimately informing the frequency of grinding.” Please outline changes made to the current grinding programme (20 October 2024 - 20 March 2025) that this more granular approach to the analysis of data has led to.

Tube Noise between Highbury and Islington and Kings Cross (6)

  • Reference: 2025/0218
  • Question by: Sem Moema
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
In answer to Question 2024/4191 it was stated that TfL has adapted its rail grinding approach in this area. How has its approach changed, how has grinding frequency and meterage increased and what difference is this expected to make to residents living locally?

Tube Noise between Highbury and Islington and Kings Cross (5)

  • Reference: 2025/0217
  • Question by: Sem Moema
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Between 20 October 2024 - 20 March 2025 the rails between Highbury and Islington and Kings Cross will have been ground once for a total 110m (see response to Question 2024/4194). Grinding frequency and meterage need to be returned to previous levels. When will this be implemented?

Tube Noise between Highbury and Islington and Kings Cross (4)

  • Reference: 2025/0216
  • Question by: Sem Moema
  • Meeting date: 16 January 2025
TfL has taken a "new" (since April 2022) data-led approach to grinding which has proved flawed because it fails to correlate with real noise as experienced by residents in their homes and as set out by in-home measurements taken by TfL's own engineers. How will TfL ensure that the concerns of my constituents regarding the noise disturbance they are forced to live with form part of its data-led approach?
Subscribe to