• Reference: 2017/2518
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1826 Which embassies and high commissions refuse to pay TfL parking and traffic tickets? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2517
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1825 Do any embassies and high commissions pay TfL parking and traffic tickets regularly; and if so which ones? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2516
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1824 What progress is being made by the Foreign Secretary in instituting proceedings at the International Court of Justice to clarify the law regarding diplomatic immunity in order to force recalcitrant governments to pay the congestion charge? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2515
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1823 What is the total debt owed to London for the congestion charge by embassies, high commissions and their staff? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2514
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1822 Which embassies and high commissions refuse to pay the congestion charge? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2513
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1821 Do any embassies and high commissions recognise the congestion charge, and pay it regularly; and if so which ones? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2512
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1816 Do you agree that there are many reasons why Old Oak Common should be designated as a temporary terminus for HS2 but high among them are that by delaying High Speed Rail services into Euston until Crossrail 2 services commence this also offers the dual benefits of (a) allowing agencies to work together to integrate the different construction schemes to help mitigate some of the disruption and; (b) helping to significantly reduce crowding particularly on the already overstretched Northern and Victoria line services during peak periods, which will make transiting through Euston that much easier...

• Reference: 2017/2511
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1815 Do you agree that without Crossrail 2 any passenger time savings from HS2 will be lost as a result of onward delays and tube station closures at Euston; and that pending Crossrail 2, the best solution to avoid such an impact on both HS2 and existing passengers at Euston is for a temporary terminus for HS2 at Old Oak Common? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2510
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1812 Further to Question No: 2017/0559: 'Can you please give the numbers of tube noise complaints TfL have received for the past 5 years - 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 & 2016 - and their location on the tube map?' Your response being: 'Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly'. Will you now provide a substantive reply? Your response being: Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. will you now give a substantive reply?

• Reference: 2017/2509
• Question by: Andrew Dismore
• Meeting date: 22 June 2017

Further to Question No: 2017/1805 On 6 March, you approved Chelsea Football Club's plans for a new £500 million stadium. How much has been the cost of policing Chelsea home games this season so far; how much has been or will be recovered from the club towards that cost; what was the full cost of policing their home games last year and how much was recovered; and do you agree that if they can afford to spend £500 million on a new stadium, they can afford to reimburse the full costs of policing their games? Your response being: Officers are...