• Reference: 2018/1465
• Question by: Siân Berry
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

Do you share my concern that just 17 per cent of the housing in the redeveloped Britannia Centre in Hackney will be affordable housing (10 per cent social rented and 7 per cent shared ownership)? This is lower than your target of 35 per cent affordable housing in new developments and lower than the 50 per cent target set by the local authority.

• Reference: 2018/1464
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

Why does your Environment Strategy omit policies to support the use of real nappies and re-usable period products to reduce single-use plastic waste?

• Reference: 2018/1463
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

Given that your Environment Strategy expects waste authorities to provide separate food waste collections as a minimum level of service to households, how do you respond to the proposal by Barnet Council to "stop all separate household food waste collections"? Link to the Barnet Council policy: https://barnet.moderngov.co.uk/documents/s46541/Street%20Scene%20Operat…

• Reference: 2018/1462
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

The City of London Corporation has committed that electric vehicle charging infrastructure will only by exception be placed on-street, and only then for fast-charge infrastructure for taxis. Will your Electric Vehicle Taskforce consider calling for all electric vehicle charging points for private car charging to be placed on pavement build outs in the carriageway and not on the footway?

• Reference: 2018/1461
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

The City of London Corporation has committed that: "charging points will only be installed in locations that have minimal impact on the public realm and do not add to street clutter or restrict pedestrian movement." Will your Electric Vehicle Taskforce produce best practice advice for positioning electric vehicle charging infrastructure to protect pedestrian convenience, safety and amenity in London?

• Reference: 2018/1460
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

Given that no car clubs are represented on your Electric Vehicle Taskforce, how will you ensure that sufficient charging infrastructure for car clubs is developed?

• Reference: 2018/1459
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

Thank you for your answer to my question 2017/2794 in which you referred to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) review of London City Airport concentrated flight paths, which includes a review of the reaction of residents affected. The CAA was due to publish its findings by summer 2017. I understand this was delayed to the end of last year, then to March and according to the latest CAA estimate it hopes to publish in June 2018. Given that the concentrated flight paths were introduced over two years ago, affecting many Londoners over this period, will you seek an assurance from...

• Reference: 2018/1458
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

The Airports National Policy Statement (NPS) says: "Where a surface transport scheme is not solely required to deliver airport capacity and has a wider range of beneficiaries, the Government, along with relevant stakeholders, will consider the need for a public funding contribution alongside an appropriate contribution from the airport on a case by case basis." What are the implication of this on the Transport for London (TfL) budget?

• Reference: 2018/1457
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

The Airports National Policy Statement (NPS) says: "In order to grant development consent, the Secretary of State will need to be satisfied that, with mitigation, the scheme would be compliant with legal obligations that provide for the protection of human health and the environment." Given your clear statement in answer to my question 2017/4325 that: "It is wrong for the Government to promote a third runway at Heathrow when its own analysis shows expansion will undermine the measures I am implementing to improve air quality and public health in London," do you agree that the Government has no hope of...

• Reference: 2018/1456
• Question by: Caroline Russell
• Meeting date: 21 June 2018

In light of the Government decision on 5 June 2018, subject to Parliamentary approval, to back a third runway at Heathrow Airport in its final Airports National Policy Statement (NPS), what steps are you taking to fulfil your pledge at Mayor's Question Time on 16 November 2016 to back legal action and provide "expert advice and assistance" to Hillingdon, Richmond and Wandsworth boroughs in their fight against this decision?