• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

On 22 October my colleague Graham Tope asked for a breakdown of how the £1 million (£800,000, as we then thought it was) on the fireworks was being spent and you said that you would give us the answer through the normal scrutiny function. We asked for it on 13 November, 20 November, again on 28 November, again on 9 December. At the Culture Committee on 10 December we asked the officer there for the breakdown and she was either unable or unwilling to give it to us. We had to pass a formal resolution asking for it again on...

• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

If you are so pleased about how it is going, what are you trying to cover up?

• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

What a laugh if you take it as a funny joke, but actually it is really quite important constitutionally. We are here to scrutinise the work of the Mayor and the money you are spending, Londoners' money, and yet you are refusing to give us this information. Can you have an avowed support for open Government when this flies in the face of that? Mike has asked what you are trying to hide. When you say you are still in detailed discussion about safety on the night and finessing the finances that does worry me. You talk about the action...

• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

It is amazing that we have a Mayor who says he is in favour of open Government and yet he is hiding behind the lawyers here. We know the GLA Act causes us all some pain at times. Mayoral advice should not be decided within the Mayor's office. You have made a decision to let this contract. That is a decision we are scrutinising and we want to see those figures. You have not answered the point about what should constitute Mayoral advice. It should be decided by an independent officer, not from the heart of your own office, because...

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

Has there been consultation with local people?

• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

That is simply not true. We did the scrutiny in 2001. We did another scrutiny last year.

• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

It is you who is generating the controversy by not giving us information that we need precisely to be able to support this event. Despite all these months of preparation you have had, you still do not have any sponsorship for the transport part. In terms of the promotion, if it is so well planned and prepared do you really think it was sensible to send out 5.75 million leaflets last week for people who need to make all sorts of family arrangements if they are going to come to London in a couple of weeks' time? Surely the promotion...

• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

I would like to ask you about next year. Again, you seem to be concentrating on just an expensive event in the centre of London. Is there not anything for the local areas, a celebration for all Londoners, not just an expensive three-minute televised event in central London? In a previous Mayor's Question Time you said you favoured early evening events in several locations around London. Can we not have more for outer London?

• Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

In one sense I have some sympathy for the Mayor for once if you look at the history of this: the Government's disaster Millennium Eve and then it dumping 2001 on the Mayor and that all collapsing, nothing to do with the Mayor but to do with the Government, and then the last two years criticised in the press for nothing happening and this year decides to do something. But, to be honest, Mr Mayor, it does cause serious questions, as you have seen from all sides, that we are 23 days from the event and you have now said...

• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 17 December 2003

You are answering a different question. We have been advised that your officers were asked to indicate which parts of the Mayoral Approval Form were Mayoral advice. It should not be up to them to decide that because they are part of the executive role. It should be part of the role of the Monitoring Officer. I think you are getting confused here.