Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Neighbourhood Policing Changes (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Richard Tracey
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Richard Tracey (AM): Mr Mayor, this is really a work in progress, as I understand it. I mean, you have not spelt out a great deal of detail to Steve O'Connell. This was something that was in your manifesto but you are intending to develop this over the next year or two years?

Neighbourhood Policing Changes (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Navin Shah
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Navin Shah (AM): I generally share some of the comments made about potential for either swallowing up or stampeding on the existing framework that might exist in the local areas or, possibility of the idea for both is not a bad one, but we will have to see what you actually come up with. The question to the Commissioner is, what timetable do you have for coming up with the whole framework for the board and, would there be any opportunity for any variation to adopt locally the right approach for the board itself for better accountability, better engagement?

Safer Neighbourhood Teams (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Len Duvall (AM): A number of boroughs have lost a number of staff, both civilian and police officers; you are talking about allocating the numbers that we have now from the recent Government grant, that is probably less than what they have lost through different ways. The figures I have seen, the figures provided by the Metropolitan Police Service, sorry, but you are talking about reallocating the smaller number of resources in terms of that, is this a new rough formula, the new policing model? What are we talking about? Are these the numbers that each borough is going to...

Safer Neighbourhood Teams (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Steve O'Connell
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Steve O'Connell (AM): Thank you. Following on from Navin, a very good question actually, many of us have a problem with our Safer Neighbourhood strengths, and it is not just in Navin's ward. Your offer, Mr Mayor, for that information could well open up floodgates, so be careful what you wish for.

Officer Numbers (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Tom Copley
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Tom Copley (AM): Thank you, Chair. Mr Mayor, I just wanted to clarify something, following on from Jenny's points. Are you or are you not saying there will be 1,000 more police officers in 2016 than there are now?

Race and Faith Inquiry (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Joanne McCartney
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Joanne McCartney (Chair): Can I just pick up a couple of things from the discussion we have had. We have talked about these various reviews that are going on into different aspects of racism. Who is actually co-ordinating this, Commissioner, at a strategic level for the Metropolitan Police Service?

Race and Faith Inquiry (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
  • Meeting date: 31 May 2012
Jennette Arnold (AM): Can I just ask the Commissioner to clarify what he just said: 7,000 leaders, did you say you had identified?

Resources (Supplementary) [3]

  • Question by: John Biggs
  • Meeting date: 08 March 2012
John Biggs (AM): Yes. If I can get away with that, I have four questions, but they should all be fairly short. The first is on early departures. Do you have a number of officers who have indicated that they want to go, but not until after the Olympics? Do you have the measure of that?

Resources (Supplementary) [2]

  • Question by: Tony Arbour
  • Meeting date: 08 March 2012
Tony Arbour (AM): On the specific point which John raised with you relating to the legal cost, are you telling us that it is possible that Lord Blair, Lord Stevens and other former luminaries at the top of the Metropolitan Police Service, we have paid to give them legal advice before they have gone to Leveson?

Resources (Supplementary) [1]

  • Question by: Jenny Jones
  • Meeting date: 08 March 2012
Jenny Jones (AM): I would like to go back to Tony's questioning, which I completely support. I think senior police officers are paid amply and could probably provide their own legal services. Perhaps we should go through all the evidence from the Leveson and work out what percentage of their answers are completely of non-public concern or where we are not liable to pay for them and we could claim our fees back. What do you think, Tony? Would you like to write to the Commissioner and suggest that? Anyway, getting back to the papers Tony Arbour (AM): I am...
Subscribe to